Elevator Pushrod Pitting Concerns?

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

Post Reply
User avatar
Ryan Smith
Posts: 1213
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:26 am

Elevator Pushrod Pitting Concerns?

Post by Ryan Smith »

Hi all,

I’m getting my money’s worth out of the forums here lately.

While the aft fuselage has been removed for my first annual, I took the time to clean up things in the tail since I was 8 years old the last time the tail was pulled off the airplane and as such, I don’t remember much about it.

One of the things I wanted to clean up was the elevator pushrod, which I planned to strip and re-prime and repaint because it had a bunch of trim overspray on it. Petty, I know. After getting it stripped, I was dismayed to see some pitting from some older rust on the pushrod. There was no new rust, and the full paint on the pushrod was likely a result of the pitting that was discovered during the restoration in the mid-90s. I don’t have a way to measure the depth right now, but I surmise it’s probably .025” at the deepest.

Is this something that can be blended out, or can it be welded, or do I need to look for a new pushrod?

Pictures attached.

Thank you!

Ryan
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21260
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Elevator Pushrod Pitting Concerns?

Post by GAHorn »

I think the Assoc’n has one in my hangar…I’ll go take a look at its’ condition…

I don’t know of any specification on this particular part…but generally speaking…such defects are commonly limited to 10% of removed material as a guideline being “OK”. Perhaps someone else might have something more definitive.

I wonder if a “scarf” joint welded would be appropriate…??
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
n2582d
Posts: 2997
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 4:58 am

Re: Elevator Pushrod Pitting Concerns?

Post by n2582d »

Ryan Smith wrote:Is this something that can be blended out, or can it be welded, or do I need to look for a new pushrod?
Ryan,
If you look at Section 5 of AC 43.13-1B you'll find various weld repairs for steel tubing but these are for structural tubes like you'd find on a J-3 or Taylorcraft frame, not for a flight control tube. You could call Cessna's Team Structures or find a DER and for a couple of AMU's they could come up with an approved repair or acceptable damage limits on that corrosion. I would also be interested in seeing if there was corrosion on the inside of the tube. The load on that pushrod is all in tension or compression; there is no side load on it. It probably won't fail in a hundred years but you already have it out. Just replace it. If George can't come up with one Dawson has this one for $150. Sutton Aircraft may have a cheaper one. The pushrod for the C-170A is very similar but a different length. Make sure you're getting p/n 0510111-5 for a 170B.

As far as measuring the depth of the pits, you could blend the corrosion out and then measure the depth with a feeler gauge or drill bit under a straight edge straddling the damage. Or send a clay mold to Cessna as seen here. :wink:
Damage Mold.png
George I'm not sure where you found the 10% number. SNL 93-3 allows up to 20% skin thickness on aluminum skins of non-pressurized airplanes and 10% on pressurized aircraft. But clearly that would not be applicable in this case.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Gary
User avatar
mschlender
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2002 1:27 am

Re: Elevator Pushrod Pitting Concerns?

Post by mschlender »

I think I have one also
Post Reply
Cessna® is a registered trademark of Textron Aviation, Inc. The International Cessna® 170 Association is an independent owners/operators association dedicated to C170 aircraft and early O-300-powered C172s. We are not affiliated with Cessna® or Textron Aviation, Inc. in any way.