gobrien wrote:Thanks George,
I continue to be amazed at the database of SBs, ADs, STC, etc. that you seem to have memorized!
I'm not concerned that the spring is missing - obviously it's in compliance with the SB. It's more I'm nosey and would like to know why it's been removed, what it's function was and why is that function no longer necessary!
Sometimes it's tough being an enginerd!
G.
Thanks for the complment …for which I am completely unworthy. It’s the “tribal knowledge” of the 170 Assoc’n that comes to the rescue of us all. People like Gary Friesen, Bruce Fenstermacher, Miles Bowen, Ed Booth, ….and geesh…I’d have to pull out the Directory and spend the day typing names…that really make this Forum and the Assoc’n so WorthWhile! (apologies to all those I didn’t have at the top of my small head)
I can’t answer they “Why” of your question…but I wonder if that throttle plate isn’t sucked wide-open by the manifold vacuum anyway if the engine is running. (Of course all that assumes the disconnect occurred at the throttle-arm… what if it was the cable itself which parted at some other point..?? Would the throttle-plate have sufficient influence to overcome the friction of a defective cable still attached..? I don’t know the answer.)