POR-15 rust inhibiter
Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher
- lowNslow
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 4:20 pm
POR-15 rust inhibiter
Has anyone used POR-15 rust coat/inhibiter? I was thinking of using this on my gear legs and was wondering if there would be any downside to using this product. It appears it might go on a little thick so may make it difficult to inspect for cracks.
http://www.por15.com/prodinfo.asp?grp=SSK&dept=1
http://www.por15.com/prodinfo.asp?grp=SSK&dept=1
Karl
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
- Bruce Fenstermacher
- Posts: 10423
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am
Karl
I have used the POR products including POR 15.
The good news is that this stuff is TUFF. The bad news is that this stuff is TUFF. What ever yo get it on it will be on for ever including your hands and any equipment you use to apply it. The POR folks do not recommend spraying this stuff and I agree. It does actually go on pretty nicely with a brush.
Again what ever you put it on you WILL NOT GET IT OFF short of a grinding wheel and that will take a long time.
POR-15 will break down under UV so it has to be top coated. Actually UV and time is about the only thing that will effect it. Not all paints can be used on top of POR-15 so check that out first.
Another problem is the shelf life. Basically once you open the quart can you need to use the paint. It hardens when it is exposed to moisture. So just opening the can starts the process that can only be slowed down but not stopped. Oh and if you put the lid back on the can without a piece of cellophane between the can and lid you will NEVER get the lid back off.
A friend who had an auto restoration business used it for undercarriages and other areas of the cars he restored. Before he knew better he took a quarter and using a drop of POR-15, glued it to his dirty garage floor in the middle of a high traffic area. The quarter was stuck there until he moved and we used a chisel to remove it damaging the concrete floor. This stuff is tuff.
Is it right for a landing gear? It could be perfect if you never plan to remove it to insect the metal. And another thing is the paint tends to have some thickness filing holes. If you need the holes for a bolt you will be drilling them back out. In fact a variant of the POR-15 product is used to seal gas tanks with rust holes. And it works.
Though I did use a PRO-15 product on some of the interior wing parts of my Cub I probably wouldn't do it again. I like the POR-15 products for a lot of things, I'm not sure airplane parts are one of them.
Did I mention this stuff is TUFF and must be treated with respect.
I'd use a two part epoxy which is much more of an excepted practice on airplanes.
I have used the POR products including POR 15.
The good news is that this stuff is TUFF. The bad news is that this stuff is TUFF. What ever yo get it on it will be on for ever including your hands and any equipment you use to apply it. The POR folks do not recommend spraying this stuff and I agree. It does actually go on pretty nicely with a brush.
Again what ever you put it on you WILL NOT GET IT OFF short of a grinding wheel and that will take a long time.
POR-15 will break down under UV so it has to be top coated. Actually UV and time is about the only thing that will effect it. Not all paints can be used on top of POR-15 so check that out first.
Another problem is the shelf life. Basically once you open the quart can you need to use the paint. It hardens when it is exposed to moisture. So just opening the can starts the process that can only be slowed down but not stopped. Oh and if you put the lid back on the can without a piece of cellophane between the can and lid you will NEVER get the lid back off.
A friend who had an auto restoration business used it for undercarriages and other areas of the cars he restored. Before he knew better he took a quarter and using a drop of POR-15, glued it to his dirty garage floor in the middle of a high traffic area. The quarter was stuck there until he moved and we used a chisel to remove it damaging the concrete floor. This stuff is tuff.
Is it right for a landing gear? It could be perfect if you never plan to remove it to insect the metal. And another thing is the paint tends to have some thickness filing holes. If you need the holes for a bolt you will be drilling them back out. In fact a variant of the POR-15 product is used to seal gas tanks with rust holes. And it works.
Though I did use a PRO-15 product on some of the interior wing parts of my Cub I probably wouldn't do it again. I like the POR-15 products for a lot of things, I'm not sure airplane parts are one of them.
Did I mention this stuff is TUFF and must be treated with respect.
I'd use a two part epoxy which is much more of an excepted practice on airplanes.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
- GAHorn
- Posts: 21297
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm
I'm thinking of the flexing which the landing gear does under normal useage. If the stuff cracked...it'd be difficult to remove/repair if I read Bruce's comments correctly.
There's another warning about these landing gear legs. According to Cessna, paint strippers cause hydrogen embrittlement in them which makes them crack and fail. If you strip your gear legs using paint stripper, you might want to bake them. (350-F for four hours should do it.) Then prime and paint them.
There's another warning about these landing gear legs. According to Cessna, paint strippers cause hydrogen embrittlement in them which makes them crack and fail. If you strip your gear legs using paint stripper, you might want to bake them. (350-F for four hours should do it.) Then prime and paint them.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.

- lowNslow
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 4:20 pm
Actually, they have spraying instructions on their web site.N9149A wrote:The POR folks do not recommend spraying this stuff and I agree. It does actually go on pretty nicely with a brush.
"SPRAY APPLICATION:
Use 30-35 lbs pressure for normal gloss. Reduce pressure for lower gloss (20-25 lbs). Thin only with POR-15 Solvent, if necessary, but do not thin more than 5%."
Karl
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
- Bruce Fenstermacher
- Posts: 10423
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am
Yes Karl I know they tell you how but they also don't recommend it. Any over spray is not coming of anything it gets on. It takes about a week to wear off your hands.
i wouldn't be worried about how heavy it is. I used their silver POR-15 on the Cub wing parts. When it's fresh and I mean when the can is first opened it is very thin and goes a long way. It is also flexible and can take a beating. They have pictures of this on their site. When I said it was tuff I didn't mean it wasn't flexible. In fact that is what might make it so difficult to remove.
After the second or third time you open the can the paint will have gotten thicker. Still usable but then you will get a thicker coat and the brush lines don't flow out.
Buying it is small quantities is the way to go and there is a reason they sell it that way.
Like I said if you never want to remove it it might be the perfect paint.
I would use POR-15 in my battery box and I would use their exhaust paint on my exhaust if I cared what they looked like. I would use their gas tank sloshing sealer if I needed to seal a tank. (And I have but not an airplane tank yet)
I stopped using it just because it was difficult to remove. I would not ever spray it unless I was willing to through away the spray equipment and had the correct breathing apparatus and in a place I didn't care where the over spray went.
And another thing is no aviation people ever heard of it and while I like to be a renegade I decided I didn't need to be a paint tester on my airplane parts. It is just to easy to use the proven 2 part epoxy stuff.
i wouldn't be worried about how heavy it is. I used their silver POR-15 on the Cub wing parts. When it's fresh and I mean when the can is first opened it is very thin and goes a long way. It is also flexible and can take a beating. They have pictures of this on their site. When I said it was tuff I didn't mean it wasn't flexible. In fact that is what might make it so difficult to remove.
After the second or third time you open the can the paint will have gotten thicker. Still usable but then you will get a thicker coat and the brush lines don't flow out.
Buying it is small quantities is the way to go and there is a reason they sell it that way.
Like I said if you never want to remove it it might be the perfect paint.
I would use POR-15 in my battery box and I would use their exhaust paint on my exhaust if I cared what they looked like. I would use their gas tank sloshing sealer if I needed to seal a tank. (And I have but not an airplane tank yet)
I stopped using it just because it was difficult to remove. I would not ever spray it unless I was willing to through away the spray equipment and had the correct breathing apparatus and in a place I didn't care where the over spray went.
And another thing is no aviation people ever heard of it and while I like to be a renegade I decided I didn't need to be a paint tester on my airplane parts. It is just to easy to use the proven 2 part epoxy stuff.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 3485
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 6:05 pm
I saw a C-195 that had black paint-on truck bed liner stuff on the leading edges of the landing gear to prevent chips and nicks. It looked good but don't know how hard it is to deal with.
Richard Pulley
2014-2016 TIC170A Past President
1951 170A, N1715D, s/n 20158, O-300D
2023 Best Original 170A at Sault Ste. Marie
Owned from 1973 to 1984.
Bought again in 2006 after 22 years.
It's not for sale!
2014-2016 TIC170A Past President
1951 170A, N1715D, s/n 20158, O-300D
2023 Best Original 170A at Sault Ste. Marie
Owned from 1973 to 1984.
Bought again in 2006 after 22 years.
It's not for sale!
- lowNslow
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 4:20 pm
Thanks George, now I need to find a oven big enough.gahorn wrote:I'm thinking of the flexing which the landing gear does under normal useage. If the stuff cracked...it'd be difficult to remove/repair if I read Bruce's comments correctly.
There's another warning about these landing gear legs. According to Cessna, paint strippers cause hydrogen embrittlement in them which makes them crack and fail. If you strip your gear legs using paint stripper, you might want to bake them. (350-F for four hours should do it.) Then prime and paint them.

Karl
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
- lowNslow
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 4:20 pm
I guess my only problem with the 2-part epoxy is that is what is on the gear now and it is rusting through. I was hoping to find something a little TUFFer.N9149A wrote:And another thing is no aviation people ever heard of it and while I like to be a renegade I decided I didn't need to be a paint tester on my airplane parts. It is just to easy to use the proven 2 part epoxy stuff.

Karl
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
- GAHorn
- Posts: 21297
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm
I'll bet you mean "shot-peening". The leading edges/lower surfaces of the landing gear legs were shot-peened to harden them against FOD/rocks/etc. damaging the gear legs, which might set up stress-risers. Unless your gearlegs have been annealed (and the baking at 350-F would not be sufficiently hot to affect that) or unless your gearlegs have been damaged and subsequently re-bent/re-shaped and need hardening after annealing, then it's unlikely they'll need shot-peening. (I've got that process/specification somewhere... I need to find it and post it so that the info will be saved for posterity. When I do I'll post it in the MX Library.)lowNslow wrote:...By the way, do you know when ball peening is required? Would this be required after heat treating?
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.

- GAHorn
- Posts: 21297
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm
By the way.... I had already posted the process. It is under paragraph 1(a) in the MX Library, http://www.cessna170.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=4973gahorn wrote:I'll bet you mean "shot-peening". The leading edges/lower surfaces of the landing gear legs were shot-peened to harden them against FOD/rocks/etc. damaging the gear legs, which might set up stress-risers. Unless your gearlegs have been annealed (and the baking at 350-F would not be sufficiently hot to affect that) or unless your gearlegs have been damaged and subsequently re-bent/re-shaped and need hardening after annealing, then it's unlikely they'll need shot-peening. (I've got that process/specification somewhere... I need to find it and post it so that the info will be saved for posterity. When I do I'll post it in the MX Library.)lowNslow wrote:...By the way, do you know when ball peening is required? Would this be required after heat treating?
The specification for shot peening is to be: Almen intensity of 0.012 to 0.016 with 330 steel shot.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.

Cessna® is a registered trademark of Textron Aviation, Inc. The International Cessna® 170 Association is an independent owners/operators association dedicated to C170 aircraft and early O-300-powered C172s. We are not affiliated with Cessna® or Textron Aviation, Inc. in any way.