Better to be good or lucky?

A place to relax and discuss flying topics.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

Post Reply
alaskan99669
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 9:49 am

Better to be good or lucky?

Post by alaskan99669 »

Be carfeul when landing on ski's to drop off a snowboarder...

Model: BL65 Description: TAYLORCRAFT BL-65
Date: 04/19/2009 Time: 2250

Event Type: Incident Highest Injury: None Mid Air: N Missing: N
Damage: Unknown

LOCATION
City: TALKEETNA State: AK Country: US

DESCRIPTION
AIRCRAFT CRASHED ON LANDING, TALKEETNA , AK

INJURY DATA Total Fatal: 0
# Crew: 1 Fat: 0 Ser: 0 Min: 0
Unk:
# Pass: 1 Fat: 0 Ser: 0 Min: 0

Image

Image

Image

Image
Corey
'53 170B N3198A #25842
Floats, Tundra Tires, and Skis
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21053
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Better to be good or lucky?

Post by GAHorn »

I always thought snowboarding was ill-conceived compared to alpine skiing. :lol:
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
Robert Eilers
Posts: 652
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 12:33 am

Re: Better to be good or lucky?

Post by Robert Eilers »

Someone has been kissing their St. Jude!
"You have to learn how to fall before you learn how to fly"
User avatar
170C
Posts: 3182
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 11:59 am

Re: Better to be good or lucky?

Post by 170C »

TALK ABOUT PUCKER FACTOR :!: :!: :!:
OLE POKEY
170C
Director:
2012-2018
Barike
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 9:18 pm

Re: Better to be good or lucky?

Post by Barike »

Will the plane be recoverable?!?! 8O I sure hope so! (Okay, I know the 'downed' plane isn't a C-170, but it's still a plane! :P ) Or will it either get pushed off or just left there? (I'm from the southern part of the US... You know, where 48 states are bunched together... :P So I don't know these types of things yet ) I'd hate to have been either the pilot or snowboarder, that's for sure!
User avatar
cessna170bdriver
Posts: 4068
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:13 pm

Re: Better to be good or lucky?

Post by cessna170bdriver »

Apparently there were no injuries, but I bet there was some laundry to do. It was probably harder to extricate the laundry from the hindparts of the occupants that it was to extricate the occupants from the airplane. 8O

Miles
Miles

“I envy no man that knows more than myself, but pity them that know less.”
— Thomas Browne
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21053
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Better to be good or lucky?

Post by GAHorn »

I would not have relished exiting that aircraft. Although I suppose staying aboard would be equally distressing.

In discussing insurance with various underwriters, a common remark was that aircraft in AK and Canada frequently have higher insurance rates because of mandatory requirements that all wreckage be removed from wilderness areas. The high cost associated with such removal efforts drives the insurance rates up to the high levels experienced by many of those operators. I was informed that a $10,000 recovery cost was not uncommon due to the need to sometimes employ heavy-lift helicopter operations.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
hilltop170
Posts: 3485
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 6:05 pm

Re: Better to be good or lucky?

Post by hilltop170 »

George is correct. Again.
Richard Pulley
2014-2016 TIC170A Past President
1951 170A, N1715D, s/n 20158, O-300D
2023 Best Original 170A at Sault Ste. Marie
Owned from 1973 to 1984.
Bought again in 2006 after 22 years.
It's not for sale!
User avatar
blueldr
Posts: 4442
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 3:16 am

Re: Better to be good or lucky?

Post by blueldr »

The same type of recovery requirements hold true in our National Forests here in the USA. I've seen a number of airplane hulks hauled out of the back country of Idaho by EXPENSIVE helicopters. (For that matter, are there any other kind?)
BL
User avatar
cfzxo
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 3:29 pm

Re: Better to be good or lucky?

Post by cfzxo »

Richard I heard that they had to go back in to activate the ELT after having exited the aircraft.

Bill CFZXO 55 170B
1SeventyZ
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 2:08 am

Re: Better to be good or lucky?

Post by 1SeventyZ »

gahorn wrote:I always thought snowboarding was ill-conceived compared to alpine skiing. :lol:
Hey, we finally agree! :) I kinda feel bad for that kid, as this incident has transcended normal aviation circles. I've been getting this email forward from a lot of non-pilots. Bad way to get famous.

-Z
Post Reply