canav8 wrote:...tailwheel pilots are better pilots. ...the tailwheel training forced you to learn what the nose wheel pilot takes for granted. Doug
I don't know that nosewheel pilots are better pilots.... It depends upon what airplane they're flying, and in what type operations they are working, when they're being evaluated.
But I agree that tailwheel pilots are infinitely more-likely to understand basic stick and rudder skills.
I believe that is partly because nosewheel pilots think in terms of the airplane travelling in the direction the nose is pointed... while tailwheel pilots understand that all airplanes travel in the same direction the tail is moving.
The same is true of a power-boat skipper....who is taught to be cognizant of, and to protect the rudder .....because It's the rudder that moves the STERN... to which the the bow is attached.
Nonetheless... unless the primary student is already the owner of a tailwheel airplane he intends to operate after completion.... then I believe it is better that he learns his primary aeronautical skills in the more forgiving tricycle gear...then transition to the conventional gear..... because the potential damage to ego (which affects perseverance) and airplane is less in the trike... Also because the certificate is more quickly and assuredly obtained, and for less time and money (which is encouraging.....not discouraging).... And also because there are a lot more skills to learn besides directional control in the early experience. The transition to tailwheels, if not excessively delayed and if properly and promptly accomplished, will not retard the pilot's advancement or skills-acquisition.
Tailwheel skills are like most other piloting skills. Like instrument, or multi, etc.,....they can be acquired at any of numerous opportunities along the career-of-learning....it's not compulsory to learn them right out-of-the-box.