Page 2 of 2
Re: panel lighting and rheostat
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 7:16 pm
by GAHorn
Bruce Fenstermacher wrote:...
And I forgot to mention answers covering a 172 cost twice what answers for a 170 cost.

Maybe Frank should purchase TWO annual TIC170A Memberships!

Re: panel lighting and rheostat
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:04 pm
by 170C
I am just glad that I have a C-170C and won't get charged for C-172 fees

It was Cleo who designated my plane as a 170C so I can't argue the point.
Re: panel lighting and rheostat
Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:40 pm
by Bruce Fenstermacher
gahorn wrote:Bruce Fenstermacher wrote:...
And I forgot to mention answers covering a 172 cost twice what answers for a 170 cost.

Maybe Frank should purchase TWO annual TIC170A Memberships!

We were about to impose that penalty George but Frank relented and agreed to serve as a Director.
Frank the C stands for Cleo, and is only a coincidence that C comes after B.
