Acceptance of Previous Sign-Offs (I.E. DON”T ignore Evidence
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2022 12:37 am
OK..so you see and read a logbook entry in your aircraft maintenance records (logbooks) that a known problem was addressed….and supposedly “cured”.
At your OWN RISK…!!
Chalk was the oldest airline in U.S. history. Their certified and FAA supervised maiintenance dept, in an effort to keep the airplanes flying…. decided to accept previous written records… and real people with real lives…. Died.
Don’t let this happen to YOU. Simply because a “crack” was “repaired” or “addressed”…. does not mean it was FIXED.
“Three stop drill holes were located in the area of the doubler repair to the lower skin at right WS 34. The stop drill holes showed that the skin crack was detected at least three times before the doublers were applied and that the crack had extended twice from the location of a previous stop drill hole. Continued crack growth from a stop drill hole is indicative of an underlying structural problem that was not properly addressed in previous maintenance actions.”
(The fact that this occurred to a seaplane operator is no excuse. If you see a “stop-drilled” crack…If you see a “doubler” which supposedly strengthens (and hides) a previous repair.THINK ABOUT that!)
https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/Acc ... AR0704.pdf
At your OWN RISK…!!
Chalk was the oldest airline in U.S. history. Their certified and FAA supervised maiintenance dept, in an effort to keep the airplanes flying…. decided to accept previous written records… and real people with real lives…. Died.
Don’t let this happen to YOU. Simply because a “crack” was “repaired” or “addressed”…. does not mean it was FIXED.
“Three stop drill holes were located in the area of the doubler repair to the lower skin at right WS 34. The stop drill holes showed that the skin crack was detected at least three times before the doublers were applied and that the crack had extended twice from the location of a previous stop drill hole. Continued crack growth from a stop drill hole is indicative of an underlying structural problem that was not properly addressed in previous maintenance actions.”
(The fact that this occurred to a seaplane operator is no excuse. If you see a “stop-drilled” crack…If you see a “doubler” which supposedly strengthens (and hides) a previous repair.THINK ABOUT that!)
https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/Acc ... AR0704.pdf