Page 1 of 1

New oil introduced - AeroShell 80 Plus

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:18 pm
by GAHorn
While researching an entirely unrelated matter I came across the following review from a European marketing website. (I cut and pasted the text to avoid risk of pop-ups, etc. The author's name/identity was not available, so his background/expertise is unknown.) What I found interesting was the discussion related to copper/cams/high-temp spalling.



Shell introduces new monograde oil


Shell has developed a new aviation monograde which takes advantage of modern additive technology. This oil, AeroShell Oil W80 Plus, is a SAE 40 grade similar to the traditional W80 grade, but includes an anti wear additive, an anti corrosion additive and a metal passivator. It complements the existing AeroShell Oil W100 Plus, a SAE 50 grade mostly used in European summer climate due to its higher base oil viscosity protection.

How do the additives in these Plus' oils work and what advantage do they give you? I am often asked about whether after market 'wonder cure' additives benefit an engine and if they can be used in aviation piston engine oils. The general rule is that, unless they have been properly tested and approved for use in aircraft engines, they should not be used. Often these additives at best give no benefit at all, or can even cause the engine harm.

Let me give you some examples. Most of the additives on the market have been developed for the automotive market, where conditions are much different to those found in aircraft engines. In automotive engines, cylinder head temperatures are much lower, the fuel is unleaded, the piston diameter to length ratio is much smaller, the mean power setting is much lower etc. I could go on, but you get the idea.

These and other factors put different demands on the oil and have lead to aviation engine oils being much different to their automotive cousins. If we take the cylinder head temperature for instance, aviation engines typically run around 100 oC hotter than automotive engines and this leads to aviation oils needing to have specialised additives which do not form ash - hence the name ashless dispersant oils. If we were to use an additive which has been developed for the automotive market, then it is likely to be an ash forming compound which can cause combustion chamber deposits, leading to pre ignition which normally rapidly leads to a hole being burned through the piston and you looking at a stationary propeller looking for somewhere to land.

Other additives, such as the Teflon type 'anti wear' additives, are sold as being able to improve engine lubrication. This type of additive is of dubious benefit and just coats the whole engine with a layer of Teflon, regardless of where it is needed. This can, at worst, restrict oil ways and limit lubricant flow, and at best is an expensive way of putting an unnecessary coating on your oil filter. If they were useful, ask yourself why the oil companies do not blend them into their oils already? These additives are not approved for use in aircraft engines, so using them is not only potentially dangerous, but also invalidates any engine warranty that you may have.

Moving onto W80 Plus - the winter twin' of AeroShell Oil W100 Plus. In these oils, the load carrying additive works in a more subtle way. The compound is blended into the oil and does not react until it is needed. The way this works is that if two moving parts start to make contact, then friction causes heat to be produced - this heat causes the additive to alter its chemical structure and it then reacts with the metal surfaces, coating them with a protective layer. If the two moving parts then try to make contact again, then they are separated by a layer of the additive even if no oil is present. In this way the additive is only deposited where it is needed.

You will appreciate that this is particularly useful in limiting wear when lubrication is marginal, such as on engine start up and on components which experience unusually high load - typically cams and cam followers.

This form of load carrying / anti wear additive is so effective that the same type of compound is used in all modern jet engine oils to improve their performance; without it these oils would not meet the demands put on them. This has also been recognised by Lycoming; they have adopted the additive under the name LW16702, and is mandated for use in their O-320H, O-360E's and TIO-541 series engines. Therefore using AeroShell Oil W80 Plus or AeroShell Oil W100 Plus means that no additional additive needs to be used if you operate one of these engines.

Not only does the AeroShell Oil W Plus range have this anti wear additive, but the oils also contain a 'metal passivator' and a corrosion inhibitor. What does this mean?

Metals such as copper are normally a problem for oils as they cause oil to degrade quicker than they would otherwise. This can be a problem as many General Aviation engines contain copper - the largest area is normally found on cam shafts which is left over from the manufacturing process. When cams are manufactured the cam face is often hardened using a process called Nitriding. This leaves a hard, but brittle, surface - ideal for the cam face, but not for the rest of the shaft. The rest of the shaft does not need to be hardened and it performs better if the surface is not brittle from the Nitriding process. So to protect the rest of the shaft, a thin layer of copper plating is used to cover all the areas which do not need to be hardened. Once the cam has been manufactured this copper serves no useful purpose, but it is not removed. This can be a problem for the oil in an engine because, as I have mentioned, the copper acts as a catalyst to make the oil degrade faster than normal - and a degraded oil does not make a good lubricant.

This is where the 'metal passivator' comes in. This additive reacts with the surface of copper components forming a protective layer which separates them from the oil, thus preventing the copper from degrading the oil.

One more additive is used in the NEW AeroShell Oil W80 Plus (as well as the existing AeroShell Oil W100 Plus and AeroShell Oil W 15W-50) and that is a corrosion inhibitor. This inhibits the formation of rust in the engine - a common root cause of engines not reaching TBO. Rust is often found in engines as used oil is acidic and, combined with dissolved water from the atmosphere, causes corrosion. If you are wondering why this problem is more pronounced than in automotive engines, it is all due to how often they are used. The average General Aviation aircraft flies for around 100 hours per year. Compare that to your own car which is probably 4 times that figure and you start to appreciate how under utilised aircraft engines generally are.

I should make it clear that AeroShell Oil W80 Plus is not a preservative oil, but an improved operational oil which has the ability to help prevent the common causes of engine damage by making use of modern additive technology. If you know that your aircraft is not going to be flown for a month or more, you should consider using a preservative oil such as AeroShell Fluid 2F.

The final thing to notice is that AeroShell Oil W80 Plus is a monograde oil - not a multigrade - and is therefore subject to the same ambient temperature limitations of all SAE 40 grade oils, such as AeroShell Oil W80. You should check your Pilot's Operating Manual to see what temperature range is suitable for SAE 40 grade oils in your aircraft. If you are looking for an SAE 50 grade oil with the same additive technology benefits, try AeroShell Oil W100 Plus, or if wanting to use a multigrade, then similar benefits to those highlighted above can be gained from using our semi-synthetic multigrade AeroShell Oil W 15W-50.

AeroShell Oil W80 Plus is available in your market today - for more information about availability or our AeroShell range of products in general, please contact


http://www.shell.com/aviation

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:12 pm
by Harold Holiman
George,

Didn't I read somewhere that it was not recommended that you use the PLUS oils in continental engines?

Harold

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 2:37 pm
by Bruce Fenstermacher
Harold don't know where you read it but we just had this discussion in another thread because the engine overhauler that we visited in Kelowna (at the conventnion) recommended not using it in Continental engines.

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:32 pm
by GAHorn
My posting of the information is not equivalent to an endorsement of the product. I merely wished to share the information and the remark regarding the camshaft and copper.