Which Aviation GPS is the best for the money???

A place to relax and discuss flying topics.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

pif_sonic
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 7:07 am

Which Aviation GPS is the best for the money???

Post by pif_sonic »

I currently have a Garmin 196. I am thinking about buying a new GPS. Which one is the best for the money, for VFR flying? I am seriously thinking about a Garmin 396. Is there another brand that is better than Garmin? I am sure this is like the argument Ford, Chevy!!! 170, 170A 170B!!!!! But I am interested in any opinions you may have.
God forbid we should ever be twenty years without a rebellion. ***Thomas Jefferson***
n3833v
Posts: 857
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 6:02 pm

Post by n3833v »

I love my Garmin 196. Thought about the new 496, maybe later.

John
John Hess
Past President 2018-2021
President 2016-2018, TIC170A
Vice President 2014-2016, TIC170A
Director 2005-2014, TIC170A
N3833V Flying for Fun
'67 XLH 900 Harley Sportster
EAA Chapter 390 Pres since 2006
K3KNT
Dave Clark
Posts: 894
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 6:25 pm

Post by Dave Clark »

Lowrance 2000 is the best value without a doubt. Well, at least IMHO.
Dave
N92CP ("Clark's Plane")
1953 C-180
User avatar
Paul-WI
Posts: 210
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:23 pm

Post by Paul-WI »

I bought the Airmap 2000C last spring and love it. Large color display, terrain awareness, and less than $700.00. I think it's a great VFR GPS for the money - I haven't got lost yet despite my best intentions. :lol: I do think that Garmin makes a great product, but the cost swayed me to the Airmap. Here is the cheapest that I found and bought from.

http://www.avionicswest.com/lowrance/2000c.htm

Paul
N3458D

EDIT: I should also have added that I also use a sectional and keep my head outside the cockpit. Being a fairly newly minted pilot it gives me piece of mind knowing I am where I think I am. My next investment is a Nav/Com with a VOR. Right now it's just compass, DG, and sectional with a GPS to assist.
Last edited by Paul-WI on Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
CraigH
Posts: 259
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 11:55 pm

Post by CraigH »

If you don't need the weather, Garmin 296 is hard to beat.
Craig Helm
Graham, TX (KRPH)
2000 RV-4
ex-owner 1956 Cessna 170B N3477D, now CF-DLR
iowa
Posts: 663
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:57 pm

Post by iowa »

it may surprise many of you,
but i have never purchased a gps!
i still like to use the sectionals.
it helps pass the time,
and i am aware at all times
exactly where i'm at.
i have considered a gps,
and my family have offered
to get me one as a xmas gift,
but in the end,
i just have never
really thot i needed one.
dave
Image
1951 170A 1468D SN 20051
1942 L-4B 2764C USAAC 43-572 (9433)
AME #17747
WWhunter
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:14 pm

Post by WWhunter »

I also looked at the 396, 496, and the Lowrance when I was at Oshkosh. I will agree that that Lowrance seems to be the best bang for the buck. But if I had the money it would be the 496.
Keith

Ps. I sent you a PM
User avatar
mit
Posts: 1051
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 1:54 am

Post by mit »

I have a 196. If I had money burning a hole in my pocket I would spend it on other things than a different GPS. :D
Tim
User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10320
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

Tim's right. I've used the 196 and 496 at work. It would be tough to justify the 3/496 cost for normal VFR flying unless you do serious scud running.

I'm in the MedEvac business and flying when there is weather in the area is part of our business. The added wx available on the 3/496 makes our job easier and safer so I'm glad to have it when I need it.

But I haven't yet been able to justify buying a 3/496 for myself to replace my GPS Pilot III which has half the capability of 196.

As for other makes of GPS I've had three friends who bought various Lowrance models last year. Two of the three have replaced them with Garmin 3/496s. Perhaps they just have to much money burning a hole in their pocket.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
mboone
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:48 pm

Post by mboone »

I have had the airmap 500 for several years and it is great for VFR. Much better price than with Garmin. Since I started flying IFR I long for the 396/496 but I can't see any advantage of these for VFR.
Bob
AR Dave
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 3:06 pm

Post by AR Dave »

Wow! I probably owe my life to GPS, several times over! I'm not publically going to tell you about those times however!
I'd give up a lot before giving up my GPS, and my wife would fight you over it then. In one of her diary entries, between Watson Lake and Fort Nelson, is written "Thank God for GPS".

Mine is an older Garmin 150 - but it comes on with the instrument air :wink: It monitors engine run time (x 8 gal/hr), points a straight line to destination, shows the distance remaining, time remaining, warns of up coming SUV's, shows my altitude, faster than altimeter (never needs adjusting) show's my true ground speed, show's all the information of any airport. When traveling long distances we plot our course, on the sectional, so we know exactly where we are at all times. This is especially handy if you havn't seen the earth for a couple of hours.
Direct To - can be cliked to immediatelly show the nearest airport, distance, etc.. It will even alarm you as to when to descend and at what speed depending upon you're input. If my engine were to stop, I could quickly see my options and how far I was going to get. It can even monitor fuel consumption, etc... immediately mark the Long/Lat position of a trophy moose or downed airplane, including me.

Saturday I jumped in the plane and flew 90 miles to my daughters state volleyball championship (which we won). Never had been there but found the airport identifier. Along the way, I realized I didn't have a clue where I was and had no sectional. Later I started second guessing if I'd entered something wrong, nothing but woods below. But when the GPS read 4.7 miles out I notified area traffic and sure enough she led me right to it. I'll have a new sectional next time I fly for backup, it's more enjoyable to cross ref a map, and it's the law. Point is, I don't need anything but that GPS!

Last year I plugged in the cooridinates ya'll gave me for Reklaw and a few hrs later she was leading right down on the East Tex Ranch. BTW I'm at work, so ya'll have lots of fun without me! :(
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21021
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Post by GAHorn »

Paul-WI wrote:... I should also have added that I also use a sectional and keep my head outside the cockpit. ...
How do you keep the bugs off your teeth? :lol:
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
cessna170bdriver
Posts: 4065
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:13 pm

Post by cessna170bdriver »

AR Dave wrote:Mine is an older Garmin 150 - but it comes on with the instrument air :wink: It monitors engine run time (x 8 gal/hr), points a straight line to destination, shows the distance remaining, time remaining, warns of up coming SUV's...
Pretty cool to have one that shows road traffic, even the type. Could be handy on those foggy days on two-lane highways. :? Yeah, yeah, Dave, I know you meant Special Use Airspace, but I couldn't help sticking it in and twisting it a bit. :twisted:
AR Dave wrote:...shows my altitude, faster than altimeter (never needs adjusting)...
Just watch out for oncoming IFR traffic (doesn't have to be IMC to have IFR traffic, you know). Due to temperature and pressure effects, it's not uncommon for the true altitude (close to what the GPS reads) to be several hundreds of feet off from the indicated altitude (as shown on a correctly adjusted altimeter).

Miles
Miles

“I envy no man that knows more than myself, but pity them that know less.”
— Thomas Browne
User avatar
Paul-WI
Posts: 210
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:23 pm

Post by Paul-WI »

Just watch out for oncoming IFR traffic (doesn't have to be IMC to have IFR traffic, you know). Due to temperature and pressure effects, it's not uncommon for the true altitude (close to what the GPS reads) to be several hundreds of feet off from the indicated altitude (as shown on a correctly adjusted altimeter).
I listened a couple of months ago to Minneapolis Center chew out a pilot flying IFR using his altimeter on his GPS for his flight altitude. They pretty much cancelled his clearance and told him in no uncertain terms that the altimeter readout on his GPS is NOT for navigating. Kind of comical and sad at the same time.


Paul
N3458D
mbram
Posts: 52
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 1:21 am

Post by mbram »

I have a Garmin 250xl coupled to a jpi fuel scan. carry a basic etrex for
backup. (Just a note the etrex vista has a barometric altimeter built in.) I found this to be a good set up for vfr flying.

I have been looking at tablet pc with gps such as the chart case software
or mercury vista nav. the software replaces paper charts. and vista nav
includes gyros and barometric altimeter.
http://www.mc.com/vistanav/
Mike
N 9545A
Post Reply