Fuel anti-icing ?

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

User avatar
jatkins
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 7:33 pm

Fuel anti-icing ?

Post by jatkins »

I was wondering about what people use for fuel anti-icing in the winter ?
I have read that lycoming engines are approved for low flow prist,@ 0.15%,.. but I cannot find anything
from Continental ?

Anything else people use ??

Thanks John
CF-HER
52 170B 20292
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21302
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Fuel anti-icing ?

Post by GAHorn »

The Type Certificate Data Sheet specifically prohibits alcohol in Cessna aircraft.

TCM SIL-99-2B states : Under certain ambient conditions of temperature/humidity, water can be supported in the fuel in sufficient quantities to create restrictive ice formation along various segments of fuel system. To alleviate the possibility
of this occurring, it is permissible to add Isopropyl Alcohol to the fuel supply in quantities not to exceed 3
percent of the total.

Diethylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether (DEGMME) conforming to military
specification MIL-DTL-85470B, if approved for use in the aircraft fuel system by the aircraft manufacturer,
may be added for this purpose. The DEGMME compound must be carefully mixed with the fuel in
concentrations not to exceed 0.15 percent by volume.

WARNING: Mixing of the DEGMME compound with the fuel is extremely important because concentration
in excess of that recommended (0.15 percent volume maximum) could have a harmful effect on
engine components. Use only blending equipment and procedures that are recommended by the
manufacturer to obtain proper proportioning.

Therefore, reading between the lines, I'd use Prist not to exceed .15%.

Keep in mind that icing particles are most hazardous in fuel injected aircraft, not carbureted engines such as in 170's.
This is because: 1) the fuel-feed system to our engines first pass thru a gascolator which floats/removes ice particles, and 2) the carb and gascolator are both sitting in a warm-air area of the downdraft cowling system.

In cold weather, be certain to drain sumps AFTER each flight to remove any water from sump areas, lest it freeze and lock the drains.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
jatkins
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2002 7:33 pm

Re: Fuel anti-icing ?

Post by jatkins »

I was wondering what the 170 guys in Alaska use for fuel anti-icing ? :?:

Also what the cut off temp was for 170 flying was ??

The local flying school here stops flying below -25c. 8O
CF-HER
52 170B 20292
hilltop170
Posts: 3485
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 6:05 pm

Re: Fuel anti-icing ?

Post by hilltop170 »

I use the red bottle of HEET (isopropyl) in Alaska. One bottle in each tank when ice formation is favorable.

My personal temp cut-off is -20°F for flying any single engine airplane and that is probably too cold if something happens and a forced landing has to be made. Below 0°F any injury such as a broken bone or bad cut caused by a forced landing may well be fatal where it would only be an inconvenience in warmer weather.

The airplane itself starts doing weird things below -20°F. The engine might not start at all or catch on fire due to over-priming, if it does start it might run rough no matter what you try, hinges bind up, controls are stiff, hydraulics are sluggish as in the case of hydraulic wheel skis, windows fog up inside and freeze so visibility is restricted, heaters can't keep up and the cockpit temp approaches ambient, passengers complain, and it generally is no fun.
Last edited by hilltop170 on Fri Dec 12, 2008 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Richard Pulley
2014-2016 TIC170A Past President
1951 170A, N1715D, s/n 20158, O-300D
2023 Best Original 170A at Sault Ste. Marie
Owned from 1973 to 1984.
Bought again in 2006 after 22 years.
It's not for sale!
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21302
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Fuel anti-icing ?

Post by GAHorn »

jatkins wrote:...Also what the cut off temp was for 170 flying was ??...
Minus 75-C.

Trivia question: What is the maximum barometric pressure it can fly?
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
cessna170bdriver
Posts: 4115
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:13 pm

Re: Fuel anti-icing ?

Post by cessna170bdriver »

gahorn wrote:
jatkins wrote:...Also what the cut off temp was for 170 flying was ??...
Minus 75-C.
The freezing point of 100ll, I presume? The following link to ConocoPhillips 100LL "marketing specifications" lists the freezing point as -58C (-72.4F).
http://www.phillips66aviation.com/pdfs/COPAvGas1406.pdf

Actually, if standard brake fluid (MIL-H-5606) is used, the limit is -65F. http://kparts.com/beta/?p=research&quer ... ulic_fluid :wink:

Miles
Miles

“I envy no man that knows more than myself, but pity them that know less.”
— Thomas Browne
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21302
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Fuel anti-icing ?

Post by GAHorn »

Most aircraft list in their limitaions sections of POH or AFM the temperature limits for operations. The 170 does not, but it's fairly common for FAR Part 23 and 25 airplanes to do so. Typical limits of several airplanes I have manuals for (and it seems to have no common thread as far as mfr), are:
Minimum for starting without pre-heat: -40C.
Minimum fuel temp: (dependent on fuel type, but -34C is common.)
Minimum for enroute flight: -75C.

No takers yet on the maximum barometric pressure for flight?
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
mod cessna
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 5:10 am

Re: Fuel anti-icing ?

Post by mod cessna »

The answer is 31.00 inches of mercury per FAR 91.144. This is a regulation that i had read in the past but never understood. That was until a few months ago on a long cross country. I found the information in the Alaska supplement.
"a. Cold, dry air masses may produce barometric pressures in excess of 31.00 inches of Mercury. Most altimiters do not have an accurate means of being adjusted for altimeter settings of these levels. "
User avatar
blueldr
Posts: 4442
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 3:16 am

Re: Fuel anti-icing ?

Post by blueldr »

George,

In your above comment, "THE MINIMUM TEMPERATURE FOR STARTING WITHOUT PREHEAT= -40C"---- how in hell do you get the thing to rotate?
I spent four years in Fairbanks, Alaska, sixty years ago. -40c in those days was also -40f, and I dont remember any engines other than jets that we ever even attempted to start without preheat at that temperature. On my Stinson L-5, I used an engine tent, a plumbers fire pot and a can to heat the oil in.
BL
User avatar
blueldr
Posts: 4442
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 3:16 am

Re: Fuel anti-icing ?

Post by blueldr »

Out here in California our Mogas comes with 5% alcohol already mixed in. Ice wouldn't DARE form in it!
BL
Robert Eilers
Posts: 652
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 12:33 am

Re: Fuel anti-icing ?

Post by Robert Eilers »

What in the world did they do in the 40s in Alaska prior to 91.144? I believe they flew.
"You have to learn how to fall before you learn how to fly"
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21302
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Fuel anti-icing ?

Post by GAHorn »

mod cessna wrote:The answer is 31.00 inches of mercury per FAR 91.144. This is a regulation that i had read in the past but never understood. That was until a few months ago on a long cross country. I found the information in the Alaska supplement.
"a. Cold, dry air masses may produce barometric pressures in excess of 31.00 inches of Mercury. Most altimiters do not have an accurate means of being adjusted for altimeter settings of these levels. "
Correctomundo! (And the additonal reason is because assigned altitudes no longer provide adequate separation.)
blueldr wrote:Out here in California our Mogas comes with 5% alcohol already mixed in. Ice wouldn't DARE form in it!
Of course, that would be ethanol and the TCDS absolutely prohibits such alcohol-based fuel. The only alcohol approved for fuel anti-icing is isopropyl. (And BEWARE! that's not the 70% stuff you find on drugstore shelves which contains water and glycerin.)
blueldr wrote:George, In your above comment, "THE MINIMUM TEMPERATURE FOR STARTING WITHOUT PREHEAT= -40C"---- how in hell do you get the thing to rotate?
Answer: Me? I don't. I was just quoting the limitations within the manuals of some aircraft.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
jrenwick
Posts: 2045
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 8:34 pm

Re: Fuel anti-icing ?

Post by jrenwick »

Maybe just a nit regarding 91.144, but the way I read it, if the FAA does not issue a NOTAM restricting flight in some way, it's still legal to fly when the pressure is above 31 inches.

So what it means to me is that if I see METARs or forecasts indicating pressures near 31", I should ask Flight Service specifically if there are any NOTAMs restricting flight at my point of departure, destination, or along my route. As long as there are none, I think I'm good to go, and even if there are, I just need to make sure I'm not violating them in any way.

Have I got that right, George?
John Renwick
Minneapolis, MN
Former owner, '55 C-170B, N4401B
'42 J-3 Cub, N62088
'50 Swift GC-1B, N2431B, Oshkosh 2009 Outstanding Swift Award, 2016 Best Continuously Maintained Swift
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21302
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Fuel anti-icing ?

Post by GAHorn »

Nope. Unless a notam is issued providing conditions for certain flights, then ...no person may operate an aircraft...

Here's the rule:
91.144 Temporary restriction on flight operations during abnormally high barometric pressure conditions.
top
(a) Special flight restrictions. When any information indicates that barometric pressure on the route of flight currently exceeds or will exceed 31 inches of mercury, no person may operate an aircraft or initiate a flight contrary to the requirements established by the Administrator and published in a Notice to Airmen issued under this section.

(b) Waivers. The Administrator is authorized to waive any restriction issued under paragraph (a) of this section to permit emergency supply, transport, or medical services to be delivered to isolated communities, where the operation can be conducted with an acceptable level of safety.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
jrenwick
Posts: 2045
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 8:34 pm

Re: Fuel anti-icing ?

Post by jrenwick »

George, I must be missing something here. Doesn't the phrase "contrary to the requirements established by the Administrator and published in a Notice to Airmen...." modify the verbs "operate" and "initiate"? In other words, I believe it's saying I may not make a flight contrary to a published NOTAM.

How are you interpreting the "contrary...." phrase?

John
John Renwick
Minneapolis, MN
Former owner, '55 C-170B, N4401B
'42 J-3 Cub, N62088
'50 Swift GC-1B, N2431B, Oshkosh 2009 Outstanding Swift Award, 2016 Best Continuously Maintained Swift
Post Reply
Cessna® is a registered trademark of Textron Aviation, Inc. The International Cessna® 170 Association is an independent owners/operators association dedicated to C170 aircraft and early O-300-powered C172s. We are not affiliated with Cessna® or Textron Aviation, Inc. in any way.