K&N filter myth
Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher
- canav8
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 2:34 pm
Re: K&N filter myth
What is interesting to note is that an aircraft filter operates in a much cleaner environment. Airborne particulates are a lot lower then what a car is exposed to. I prefer the more airflow in an aircraft application. I do not stand behind any sales hype but I am a huge fan of the Challenger Air Filter and Oil Filter as well. I have worked with Dyno tests on boat and car engine applications. The question you must ask is what is the job you seek a product to do for you best in the environment you will use it. IMO. D
52' C-170B N2713D Ser #25255
Doug
Doug
- GAHorn
- Posts: 21301
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm
Re: K&N filter myth
The clean air found at altitude is not when you need the most air flow.
The most critical time for achieving most power is at takeoff and landing/go-around,....
down on the dirt strip,... down in the dirty places, ...which is also where you need better filtering and
where the engine suffers the most likely exposure to damage,...and where the engine failure is
most hazardous.
Additionally, filtration is not the only consideration when making the selection. One should also consider physical structure and support. If a filter collapses and is sucked into the intake plenum, the loss of power can be almost total.
The most critical time for achieving most power is at takeoff and landing/go-around,....
down on the dirt strip,... down in the dirty places, ...which is also where you need better filtering and
where the engine suffers the most likely exposure to damage,...and where the engine failure is
most hazardous.
Additionally, filtration is not the only consideration when making the selection. One should also consider physical structure and support. If a filter collapses and is sucked into the intake plenum, the loss of power can be almost total.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.

-
- Posts: 2615
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:35 pm
Re: K&N filter myth
That exact thing happened to my Dad on takeoff. A section of the filter separated, clogged the intake and reduced the motor to idle power. Luckily, he walked away and the plane was repairable. The soybeans stopped him in 60 feet.gahorn wrote: Additionally, filtration is not the only consideration when making the selection. One should also consider physical structure and support. If a filter collapses and is sucked into the intake plenum, the loss of power can be almost total.
- minton
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 2:20 am
Re: K&N filter myth
After reading over the data and testing I'm wondering where "Brackett" filters stand in the mix?
- GAHorn
- Posts: 21301
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm
Re: K&N filter myth
I don't know about where Brackett fits for filtration in that comparison, but their construction includes a wire-screen to prevent the material from being sucked into the intakes.
Some folks complain about the Brackett filter reducing air-flow, claiming they've witnessed it after switching to the Brackett. I don't see that (I have the Brackett), but I follow the Brackett instructions to blot the excess "wettant" using a dry cloth or paper towels.
Some folks complain about the Brackett filter reducing air-flow, claiming they've witnessed it after switching to the Brackett. I don't see that (I have the Brackett), but I follow the Brackett instructions to blot the excess "wettant" using a dry cloth or paper towels.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.

-
- Posts: 3485
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 6:05 pm
Re: K&N filter myth
I gained 1/2" manifold pressure at takeoff power on my C-180 after switching from the stock paper filter to the Brackett.
I haven't used any of the Gucci filters so don't know how they compare to the Brackett.
I haven't used any of the Gucci filters so don't know how they compare to the Brackett.
Richard Pulley
2014-2016 TIC170A Past President
1951 170A, N1715D, s/n 20158, O-300D
2023 Best Original 170A at Sault Ste. Marie
Owned from 1973 to 1984.
Bought again in 2006 after 22 years.
It's not for sale!
2014-2016 TIC170A Past President
1951 170A, N1715D, s/n 20158, O-300D
2023 Best Original 170A at Sault Ste. Marie
Owned from 1973 to 1984.
Bought again in 2006 after 22 years.
It's not for sale!
- 170C
- Posts: 3182
- Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 11:59 am
Re: K&N filter myth
I know a couple of 170 members/owners that switched from the Bracket filters to K&N and "say" they could tell a difference in takeoff performance. Maybe, maybe not
Might be after spending all that $ they felt it had to increase something 


OLE POKEY
170C
Director:
2012-2018
170C
Director:
2012-2018
-
- Posts: 2615
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:35 pm
Re: K&N filter myth
Couldn't afford to top off the tanks so, there was a weight savings there too 

Cessna® is a registered trademark of Textron Aviation, Inc. The International Cessna® 170 Association is an independent owners/operators association dedicated to C170 aircraft and early O-300-powered C172s. We are not affiliated with Cessna® or Textron Aviation, Inc. in any way.