Reason 127 why Franklin engine conversions are a bad idea

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

marathonrunner
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:49 am

Reason 127 why Franklin engine conversions are a bad idea

Post by marathonrunner »

This is what it takes to change a starter. Oh yes Sky tec no longer supports their starters so you get to buy one of the NOS ones at Franklin Aircraft Parts in Texas. The Sky Tec will barely fit in after you send it to Sky Tec to spin it to get the bendix out as far as it will go to be wormed in and clear the gear. The NOS is to long to accomplish this without disconnecting things that will stretch...throttle cable, tach cable, prop cable, associated wiring , breather and vacuum hoses.

Takes about 7- 8 hours start to finish. Now is a good time to do your magneto 500 hour inspection
Attachments
image.jpg
It's not done till it's overdone
bagarre
Posts: 2615
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:35 pm

Re: Reason 127 why Franklin engine conversions are a bad ide

Post by bagarre »

That's some interesting firewall bracing. Was that part of the conversion?
marathonrunner
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:49 am

Re: Reason 127 why Franklin engine conversions are a bad ide

Post by marathonrunner »

For the Franklin it was. He has all the paperwork for that conversion. Amazingly he bought it with the Franklin installed. The previous owner REMOVED an Avcon 180 HP conversion to install the Franklin. Not sure when the 360 Continental became available.

Had to persuade one mount hole to line up on installation. Come alongs are great tools on occasion
It's not done till it's overdone
User avatar
170C
Posts: 3182
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 11:59 am

Re: Reason 127 why Franklin engine conversions are a bad ide

Post by 170C »

Reason 128 (if not already mentioned) is that Franklin's use 14 mm spark plugs and according to my friend with a Stinson 108, those can be somewhat difficult to find and are more expensive than the larger ones used in Continental & Lycoming's.
OLE POKEY
170C
Director:
2012-2018
User avatar
ghostflyer
Posts: 1406
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:06 am

Re: Reason 127 why Franklin engine conversions are a bad ide

Post by ghostflyer »

What was he smoken, to take a 180HP out and fit a Franklin? Must have been a bad batch of wacky weed to do that. I know people say that the 180HP lycoming vibrates But!! how many Cessna,s , Pipers and other aircraft manufactures fit that engine to their airframe? Plus having the engine and prop dynamically balanced helps big time . plus its not a huge cost.
marathonrunner
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:49 am

Re: Reason 127 why Franklin engine conversions are a bad ide

Post by marathonrunner »

Actually the 14 mm depends on whether you have the original Franklin or the PZL version. This is the latter and has 18mm plugs. I do have a nearly full box of Champion 14 mm plug gaskets. They also did away with the floating oil pick up. Always did wonder why people put filters on the old style since the oil is picked up from the top. Drain it through a tee shirt and see what you get.
It's not done till it's overdone
User avatar
blueldr
Posts: 4442
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 3:16 am

Re: Reason 127 why Franklin engine conversions are a bad ide

Post by blueldr »

Maybe the reason to have converted from the Lycoming to the Franklin was to get the forty more horsepower. It does make an awesome performer.
BL
marathonrunner
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:49 am

Re: Reason 127 why Franklin engine conversions are a bad ide

Post by marathonrunner »

The continental makes more sense
It's not done till it's overdone
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21052
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Reason 127 why Franklin engine conversions are a bad ide

Post by GAHorn »

ghostflyer wrote:What was he smoken, to take a 180HP out and fit a Franklin? Must have been a bad batch of wacky weed to do that. I know people say that the 180HP lycoming vibrates But!! how many Cessna,s , Pipers and other aircraft manufactures fit that engine to their airframe? Plus having the engine and prop dynamically balanced helps big time . plus its not a huge cost.
Those later Cessnas, etc. also have very different engine mounts with large, SOFT rubber Lord mounts to help absorb those four cylinders banging away trying to make 180 hp.
Yep, he was smokin' something bad...to miss out on a Continental 6-cylinder IO-360 making 210 HP.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
DaveF
Posts: 1522
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:44 am

Re: Reason 127 why Franklin engine conversions are a bad ide

Post by DaveF »

Well, as they say, laugh if you want; keep up if you can.

My son and I flew up to Leadville on Saturday. Those four cylinders banged away, somehow getting the two of us and full fuel off the runway at 7000 DA, then hauling us upward at 400fpm to 14500'. Oh, the banging was terrible! Why, even the Blackhawk pilot on the ramp at Leadville came over to ask if everything was ok. Then, thanks to that infernal banging, the takeoff at 11700' DA took a whole 1000 feet of runway! I tell you, the banging sucked all the enjoyment right out of the flight! :lol: :D
Leadville from east.jpg
On the ramp at KLXV.jpg
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21052
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Reason 127 why Franklin engine conversions are a bad ide

Post by GAHorn »

How many hours do you have on the Lyc? and what does that fiberglass nose cowl look like up close? :wink:

Of the several I've inspected after a few hundred starts, the cowl looks horrible due to all the shakin' goin' on, and the windshields also don't last long without cracking. (But the takeoff/climb performance is truly wonderful.)
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
DaveF
Posts: 1522
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:44 am

Re: Reason 127 why Franklin engine conversions are a bad ide

Post by DaveF »

My Avcon is one of the oldest, done in 1973 and 2300 hours ago. The windshield is fine (20 years), but the nose is pretty bad. The fiberglass itself is ok, but the Bondo the installer used is cracked and nasty. I hate it, and am planning a nose bowl renovation at some point, including replacing the fiberglass cowl bumps with aluminum, like Del-Air uses. I've owned three airplanes made in the 1970s and have a strong hatred of any parts made of plastic or fiberglass. They just don't hold up.
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21052
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Reason 127 why Franklin engine conversions are a bad ide

Post by GAHorn »

Do you have a "one piece" (floating) windshield?
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
DaveF
Posts: 1522
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:44 am

Re: Reason 127 why Franklin engine conversions are a bad ide

Post by DaveF »

Yes, strapless floating "one-piece".
User avatar
dunlaps3
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 3:12 am

Re: Reason 1 why Franklin engines are Awesome.

Post by dunlaps3 »

Well it looks like "Reason 127" does not apply to me. I have taken off my starter and mags without any trouble. Maybe your engine mount was built too short.
And I don't know what the other " 126 reasons " are , but for me , both my 170B's with 220 HP Franklins have been Great Engines. I have had "Zero" problems with them in the 15+ years that I have had them. I can't say that about my $45,000 Factory built Lycoming IO-540 that has let me down twice in 200 hrs since new ! and BTW , the spark plugs in my 6A-350-C1 s are standard 18MM , not 14mm. Andrew
Post Reply