Bubble Window STC?

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

Post Reply
punkin170b
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 3:30 pm

Bubble Window STC?

Post by punkin170b »

Has anybody come across a holder of a bubble window STC for the 170B? I have found a couple (including Great Lakes Aero) that have an STC for 172s, but NOT 170s specifically. I'd like a 2 or 4 inch bubble (6 is just too grotesque!). Anyone? Buehller? Thanks...
Matt
"Rule books are paper. They will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal." (E.K. Gann)
zero.one.victor
Posts: 2271
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 12:11 am

Post by zero.one.victor »

WagAero sells some bubble windows,butr sez they are STC'd only for the 180. A field-approval based on that 180 approval might not be too hard.....

Eric
User avatar
mit
Posts: 1067
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 1:54 am

Post by mit »

There are several around here done on a field approval.
Tim
N170BP
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 7:24 pm

Post by N170BP »

Just curious, why do you want bubble side windows?

Apart from the increased "elbow room" and being
able to peer down a bit more by sticking your
head into the bubble so-to-speak, you'll lose cruise
speed (my information says they'll cost you 3 or so mph)
and you'll experience distortion (view out the side windows)
while taxiing in close quarters (the latter, admittedly, being
not that big a deal to some, but a bigger deal to others
who can't see right as it is!).
Bela P. Havasreti
Image
'54 C-180
punkin170b
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 3:30 pm

Post by punkin170b »

Hi Bela,
My reasons for considering bubble windows are: 1) I always "donk" my head on the plexi when I'm trying to peer down to inspect an "unimproved" strip I am thinking about landing on. 2) the 2 or 4 inch windows have very little distortion. 3) The guys I know who have them on 180/185s can't tell a difference in speed 3) my bird has been kinda tweaked here and there to become more practical for "back country use" and the mod wouldn't detract much from "originality" in my case. 5) they make you look hip when parked at Chamberlain or Big Creek, ID... that is someday when I can return to the mountains (and my back country friends stop calling me "flatlander"!). hehehe... No offense, George!
Matt :D
"Rule books are paper. They will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal." (E.K. Gann)
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21291
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Post by GAHorn »

HA! I was about to kid you by asking how many mountains you've seen down there in The Woodlands! (Flat, sandy, pine forests bordering on swampland but priced at Santa Fe prices, for those who don't know.)
Hey, Matt! I'm at U42 and dong a little mx while enroute at Salt Lake Air. The mx supervisor Ivan, told me about a 170 owned by a buddy of his based just 30 miles north! Took me a minute to realize who he was talking about. :lol:
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
punkin170b
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 3:30 pm

Post by punkin170b »

Man, aviation is a small community! Please tell Ivan howdy from us. The SLC-area aviation community is full of great people... Found some great ones down here too (as it is everywhere) - but kinda miss the gang up there!
Matt
"Rule books are paper. They will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal." (E.K. Gann)
User avatar
mit
Posts: 1067
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 1:54 am

Post by mit »

It's real fun to watch people bump their nose's on the windows when they try to look inside. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Tim
punkin170b
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 3:30 pm

Post by punkin170b »

Man, that's the other thing I wanted the bubble windows for. I hate cleaning my gooey forehead-prints off the inside of the window. Tim, now you're saying I'll hafta clean the OUTSIDE? And it won't even be my own goobers? Yuck. Maybe I'll stick with Bela on this... hehehe! :roll:
"Rule books are paper. They will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal." (E.K. Gann)
User avatar
mit
Posts: 1067
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 1:54 am

Post by mit »

Oh NO it's worth the pain of the cleaning! I love my bubbles! :wink:
Tim
JMACFLY
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:13 pm

4" bubble windows

Post by JMACFLY »

We installed 4" bubbles from LP Plastics about 5 years ago. Best return on our investment for cockpit comfort. I dont notice distortion, or any speed loss. Even when the lift struts are covered with bugs, the bubbles seldom get many hits. Forget the Rosen Visors, install 4" bubbles.
John
John
1949 C170A
TIC170A #4747
User avatar
blueldr
Posts: 4442
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 3:16 am

Post by blueldr »

My experience with bubble windows has all been negative. Opening them in flight can be an exciting event. They will almost shake off the airplane. How in the world did they improve cockpit comfort?
BL
AR Dave
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 3:06 pm

Post by AR Dave »

I don't know if mine are 4" or 6" (probably 6") but I love them. I believe they've saved my life more than once. From avoiding moose stalls to the time I jammed the alder limb in my horizontal stabilizer and had absolutely no up or down. Sure was helpful to look back at the tail and see that stick stuck in there! 8O Being able to look behind or below can be more than just a great convience. I fly with my elbow in the bubble because my shoulder would be folded inward otherwise. My wife puts a pillow in her window and lays her head more horizontal and comfortable. Having a 12" wider cabin certainly improves comfort for us. Once a sightseeing passenger realizes the bubble is there, that's where his head is going to be. I guess because they're rounded is why the bugs don't stick. If there is a view distortion, I've never seen it and we get excellent video footage! But I must have a different kind because flying with the windows open is no problem either. I will admit that I don't fly with the windows open much but that’s more because of noise, I used to open them when making TP drops however. I am about 15 mph slower, the bubble windows might the culprit, but I'd have to give em credit for my great climb performance. They've been on the plane since the 70's or 80's so I've never flown without them. One more important thing (beauty in the eye of the beholder), they look so way cool! 8) I was looking through the books a while back and saw a written field approval or 337.
JMACFLY
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:13 pm

more comfort with bubbles

Post by JMACFLY »

Blueldr, we get approx 4" per side of extra shoulder room, and arm rests to boot. Flat windows for aerial photos and TP are best. I have one left side flat window that I sometimes carry that can be installed in a moment's notice. I dont like the wind loads on my window hinges with the bubbles open, and they don't "park" under the wing like the flat ones do. Perhaps the speed loss mentioned is caused by ball deflection whilst looking out the window.
John
John
1949 C170A
TIC170A #4747
Post Reply
Cessna® is a registered trademark of Textron Aviation, Inc. The International Cessna® 170 Association is an independent owners/operators association dedicated to C170 aircraft and early O-300-powered C172s. We are not affiliated with Cessna® or Textron Aviation, Inc. in any way.