Leaning and Engine Performance (split topic)

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

User avatar
pdb
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 3:39 am

Post by pdb »

blueldr wrote:A question for pdb. ----- If you were flying the trench which at 400 sm is well within the normal range of a C-170 (A or B) in still air, you would have no reason to slow to 88 mph for fuel conservation. If you were bucking a headwind that was eating into your fuel mileage, 88 mph would surely be the wrong thing to do.
I don't see what advantage 88 mph would be other than to save fuel in a tailwind. Enlighten me!
Randal is right...its to give me more options (read more range) in the event of adverse, unforseen weather. You do that by flying just a bit faster than best glide (max L/D). My back of the envelope flight testing suggest that best L/D is about 88. That figure seems to be generally consistent with the tables in the POH.

Your right about the headwind, slowing up is the wrong thing. I would speed up at least about 1/2 of the headwind over best glide. In a 20 mph headwind I would fly no less than 98 mph. (88 +1/2(20).

In a tailwind, I would slow up but no slower than min sink. Unfortunately I don't know what minimum sink (-0- power) is so its a bit academic for me at this point.

Unortunately my 170 is a lot slower than many because I have big tires, bubble windows, and an 80/40 prop. That knocks quite a bit off my normal cruising speed so the whole issue of range become a bit more serious. Gas is not always available along the route so getting half way before turning back can increase the excitement factor more than I like.
Pete Brown
Anchorage, Alaska
N4563C 1953 170B
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2366/2527 ... 4e43_b.jpg
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21291
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Post by GAHorn »

pdb ....sounds like you need to find a Javelin tank set up. :wink:
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
pdb
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 3:39 am

Post by pdb »

gahorn wrote:pdb ....sounds like you need to find a Javelin tank set up. :wink:
George:

I would love to find one. Any ideas where I should start looking?

Pete
Pete Brown
Anchorage, Alaska
N4563C 1953 170B
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2366/2527 ... 4e43_b.jpg
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21291
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Post by GAHorn »

From time to time they show up for sale in The Flypaper, and the salvage yards sometimes have them. If you find one, let me know. I have the installation drawings, etc.
O & N sells their baggage aux tank set up, which is very similar, but I believe it is STC'd for the 172...not the 170. A field approval or one-time STC would be req'd. The beauty of the Javelin kit is that no further basis of approval is necessary, as it is approved by Type Certificate A-799.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
Post Reply
Cessna® is a registered trademark of Textron Aviation, Inc. The International Cessna® 170 Association is an independent owners/operators association dedicated to C170 aircraft and early O-300-powered C172s. We are not affiliated with Cessna® or Textron Aviation, Inc. in any way.