
KX125 Comm/Nav
Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 5:33 pm
KX125 Comm/Nav
Is there a problem with a KX125 comm/nav relative to higher frequencies? I have one in the C-170A that I recently bought and someone mentioned that I might not be allowed to use the transmitter without an FCC exception or something like that? 

Richard Hall
Ghostrider Aviation
Ghostrider Aviation
-
- Posts: 2271
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 12:11 am
The KX-125 is a modern digital nav-com, self-contained with no external nav indicator needed. I've never heard about any frequency problems with it. Except maybe in the future,when they go to that proposed new frequency spacing-- then we'll all have to pony up some big bucks for new radio's!
Whoever you talked to might have been thinking of the old KX-145. It was a nav-or-com radio, you can either use the nav or the com, just not both at once. It's old enough where it's probably a 360 (or less!) channel com, with the transmitting frequencies not precise enough to meet the newer FAA/FCC spec's. In other words,for example on 123.0, it'll bleed over onto 123.025 or 123.05.
Depending on the frequencies you use in your everyday flying, it might give plenty good service, it's just not strictly legal. They are approved to have installed, but I think they have to be placarded "nav only". Or at least "not approved for transmitting" or something like that.
Eric

Whoever you talked to might have been thinking of the old KX-145. It was a nav-or-com radio, you can either use the nav or the com, just not both at once. It's old enough where it's probably a 360 (or less!) channel com, with the transmitting frequencies not precise enough to meet the newer FAA/FCC spec's. In other words,for example on 123.0, it'll bleed over onto 123.025 or 123.05.
Depending on the frequencies you use in your everyday flying, it might give plenty good service, it's just not strictly legal. They are approved to have installed, but I think they have to be placarded "nav only". Or at least "not approved for transmitting" or something like that.
Eric
-
- Posts: 1373
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 2:06 am
The KX-125 is one of King's current production models in the "cost effective" category. I seriously considered one last year. There's nothing about this model that should require any sort of "waiver" or "exception". The only paperwork hoops should be the 337-type ones on getting it installed - which in your case "should" already be done.
Go fly and use it. There are radios still flying out there (probably illegally) with far less capability than the KX-125.
Here's the link to King's product page:
https://www3.bendixking.com/static/cata ... jsp?pid=85
Go fly and use it. There are radios still flying out there (probably illegally) with far less capability than the KX-125.
Here's the link to King's product page:
https://www3.bendixking.com/static/cata ... jsp?pid=85
Doug
-
- Posts: 894
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 6:25 pm
Gee my airplane has a KX125 (which I think is great) AND a KX145
I like the 145 as a backup, in fact I bought anuther on Ebay cheap so I wouldn't have to worry about it going out. I must confess that I've transmitted on it. The day before we were to leave WA for AZ a few years back the 125 went out so I had to use the 145 to get home to AZ. Works great.

I like the 145 as a backup, in fact I bought anuther on Ebay cheap so I wouldn't have to worry about it going out. I must confess that I've transmitted on it. The day before we were to leave WA for AZ a few years back the 125 went out so I had to use the 145 to get home to AZ. Works great.
Dave
N92CP ("Clark's Plane")
1953 C-180
N92CP ("Clark's Plane")
1953 C-180
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 5:33 pm
KX125 Comm/Nav

Richard Hall
Ghostrider Aviation
Ghostrider Aviation
Cessna® is a registered trademark of Textron Aviation, Inc. The International Cessna® 170 Association is an independent owners/operators association dedicated to C170 aircraft and early O-300-powered C172s. We are not affiliated with Cessna® or Textron Aviation, Inc. in any way.