IFR and venturies?
Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher
-
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 2:25 am
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 2:20 am
I have another wuestion, with the ventury set up how long does it take to properly spool up the instruments?
I doubt taking off with a 300ft ceiling is going to be very smart, I'm wondering what a good set of minimums would be? Maybe you sit on the end of the runway for a few minutes at high rpm to get some airflow, I don't know.
Dave
I doubt taking off with a 300ft ceiling is going to be very smart, I'm wondering what a good set of minimums would be? Maybe you sit on the end of the runway for a few minutes at high rpm to get some airflow, I don't know.
Dave
There's generally not enough airflow to to really spool them up just sitting there and running the engine. When I do my mag check I usually see around 1" on the suction gage. The wear and tear on the engine wouldn't be worth the effort.
I find I'm usually in good shape by the time I reach pattern altitude, but then again, I'm not IFR.
I find I'm usually in good shape by the time I reach pattern altitude, but then again, I'm not IFR.
Doug
-
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 2:25 am
Dave: The minumum ceiling you are willing to take-off in is a function of your experience, comfort level and how well your venturi system is set up.
No doubt about it, venturi systems are all over the map, with varied degrees of performance. They are less forgiving of old collapsed hoses,
dirty filters, and worn out gyros. Some guys report their gyros aren't up to speed until they reach cruise speed. Some don't seem to work well even then.
I went to great effort to maximize the performance of my set-up, since I fly IFR. I replaced all the hoses with aviation grade. I replaced the wallowing ADI with a new RC Allen unit. The DG was made by long-defunct Standard Precision - it has a 1969 overhaul date stamped on the case! Works flawlessly. I adjusted the regulator to read about 5.0 hg in cruise - I have one of those later model Cessna peanut gauges. My airplane made it all the way from 1952 to 1990 with only an electric turn and bank; the previous owner added the gyros and venturi.
If I set my DG at the end of my runup at 1,700 rpm it is up to speed enough to be lined up with the runway after turning 90 degrees. By 200 feet at 90 mph, they both seem to be working normally. My 500 foot personal limit is a fudge factor on gyro operation AND the fact I wouldn't take-off in ANY single lower than that.
Take the time to get it right and I'm sure you'll be very pleased...Russ Farris
No doubt about it, venturi systems are all over the map, with varied degrees of performance. They are less forgiving of old collapsed hoses,
dirty filters, and worn out gyros. Some guys report their gyros aren't up to speed until they reach cruise speed. Some don't seem to work well even then.
I went to great effort to maximize the performance of my set-up, since I fly IFR. I replaced all the hoses with aviation grade. I replaced the wallowing ADI with a new RC Allen unit. The DG was made by long-defunct Standard Precision - it has a 1969 overhaul date stamped on the case! Works flawlessly. I adjusted the regulator to read about 5.0 hg in cruise - I have one of those later model Cessna peanut gauges. My airplane made it all the way from 1952 to 1990 with only an electric turn and bank; the previous owner added the gyros and venturi.
If I set my DG at the end of my runup at 1,700 rpm it is up to speed enough to be lined up with the runway after turning 90 degrees. By 200 feet at 90 mph, they both seem to be working normally. My 500 foot personal limit is a fudge factor on gyro operation AND the fact I wouldn't take-off in ANY single lower than that.
Take the time to get it right and I'm sure you'll be very pleased...Russ Farris
All glory is fleeting...
Russ's words are all good, wise, and correct.
Let me add that modern "pictorial" (3-1/8") gyros require more vacuum (ideally 5.5") than the original "AN" series (which required only 3.5"). The original AN gyros had larger, more massive rotors which were easier to get spinning with low vacuum because the jets were directed at a larger outer circumference, and once spinning they were more inclined to keep spinning. (A large water wheel in a small stream will do a lot more work than a small water wheel in a river.)
Let me add that modern "pictorial" (3-1/8") gyros require more vacuum (ideally 5.5") than the original "AN" series (which required only 3.5"). The original AN gyros had larger, more massive rotors which were easier to get spinning with low vacuum because the jets were directed at a larger outer circumference, and once spinning they were more inclined to keep spinning. (A large water wheel in a small stream will do a lot more work than a small water wheel in a river.)
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 2:20 am
If you're getting seven inches of vacuum, you need a regulator or an adjustable bleed valve to set it at not more than the amount recommended for the type of instruments installed. If the vacuum is too high it will cause the gyros to overspeed their normal range and will cause excessive wear on the bearings and perhaps over sensitivity of the gyros.
BL
-
- Posts: 2271
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 12:11 am
If you do need to buy a regulator, I found some in the spruce catalog. The Airborne brand regulators (4 different models) list for $600 & up. A single Rapco is listed at $147, sez it's a direct replacement for Airborne 2H3-12 & is "FAA approved". Also four Tempest regulators which are FAA-PMA & list for a bit over $200.
Eric
Eric
-
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 1:52 am
You might want have your suction gauge tested. I have found most aircraft vacuum gauges to be very inaccurate. just a litttle more HE!!dkalwishky wrote:Ok, that annual from he!! is finally done.
I test flew the airplane and the suction gauge is reading 7 inches in flight! I now am wondering if I need a regulator. I also wonder if too much suction is a bad thing for the instruments.
Dave
I only read the last page of this post so I do not know if you have already done this.
A&P, IA, New owner C170A N1208D, Have rebuilt some 50 aircraft. So many airplanes, So little time!
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 2:20 am
While the excessive vacuum won't cause increased "sensitivity" it will cause increased wear and precession. (You may have to reset your DG more often.)
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 2:20 am