Another question to the mechanic guys

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

SUNDBY
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 10:17 pm

Another question to the mechanic guys

Post by SUNDBY »

I am in the long process of a complete restoration of my B model. I am about to plumb/install the pitot/static system. The question is, can I, should I, consider using newer technology nylon tubing inleu of using aluminum lines. My IA questions if that is legal? Can anyone expound on this and the legality of it. Where is the line drawn for STC or PMAed parts or components. Under advice I have ordered the hoses for the oil pressure lines, both fore and aft. All the wiring is new including CB's. Long story long, what legal issues and what language from our friends at the FAA makes these changes legal? George?, anyone? Thank you for the discussion. Sundby
Nels Sundby
User avatar
Showboatsix
Posts: 113
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 5:38 am

Re: Another question to the mechanic guys

Post by Showboatsix »

[quote="SUNDBY"]I am in the long process of a complete restoration of my B model. I am about to plumb/install the pitot/static system. The question is, can I, should I, consider using newer technology nylon tubing inleu of using aluminum lines. My IA questions if that is legal?[/quote="SUNDBY"]

My question to the IA would be, ...."Are we going to use the old cloth covered wires over too? Is it legal to use modern avaiation wiring also, if we can upgrade to the "modern wiring" why not the "modern pma tubing"?

I did N6863A 11 years ago to both with no problem from any of the A/P/IA's who have inspected my plane.
UAO, Aurora Oregon
Hanger 26
56' C-172, With Conventional Gear Conversion
S/N 28963
N6863A
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21052
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Another question to the mechanic guys

Post by GAHorn »

Use the new plastic tubing. (It doesn't corrode, fracture, and is easier to route around corners, etc.) It's a standard part. (Doesn't require PMA, STC, etc.) It also has a Cessna part number if your mechanic wants documentation on it. You can buy it from Aircraft Spruce.

Many substitutions are actually "minor" alterations. (See FAR 43 for definitions) Minor alterations may be made by simple logbook entry.

Otherwise, parts which are commonly known as "standard parts" do not require any additional documentaton other than traceability. An example is common AN hardware such as bolts, nuts, washers, or Aeroquip fittings, etc. (This is NOT hardware-store hardware, commonly known also as Grade 2 or 5. In other words, don't buy them from inside a guy's trench-coat on ebay-alley.) :twisted:

Stangely, there are some common hardware items which are actually approved in some aircraft installations, but this response isn't going to get that deep. (Examples might be brass fuel and pnuematic fittings.)

Basically all supplies/equipment must be "aircraft quality" meaning they are traceable to either an approved aircraft mfr'g source or must be categorized as "standard" parts.

If you are altering an existing system (such as changing out fuses for circuit breakers) the wire and the cb's must be aircraft parts and the alteration should comply with AC 43.13 -1B as to methods/materials. If it's merely the replacement of existing equipment it's a repair and merely needs recordation. If it's a true alteration, then it is either minor or major. If minor, it merely needs a logbook entry. If it's major, it requires a Form 337 be completed and filed with FAA. If it's a completely new design it will require engineering approval (DER) or "Field Approval" (FAA signature in Block 3 of the Form 337) or it will require and STC.

It's my opinion that merely replacing original/existing wire with modern "tefzel" aircraft wiring, and substituting CB's for fuses, is a minor alteration. (Don't use Auto-Zone electrical connectors either. They do not comform to any standard of materials, and frequently use PVC insulation. Use aircraft grade electrical connectors, ring-terminals, etc. You can purchase all the necessary materials from Spruce 877-477-7823, or http://www.aircraftspruce.com/ )

Example: "Replace existing navigational-light wiring with new, MIL-W-22759/16 wire of same (or proper or stated) gauge. Replace existing fuse and fuse-holder with Klixon 7271-8 circuit breakers of same (or proper or stated) capacity. All materials/methods comply with AC 43.13-1B. This electrical circuit design has not otherwise changed." and the date, signature, cert. no. , of course.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
lowNslow
Posts: 1530
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 4:20 pm

Re: Another question to the mechanic guys

Post by lowNslow »

What size plastic tubing is generally used for replacing the tubing in the pitot/static system? Also what sized fittings are used at the instruments?
Karl
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
T. C. Downey
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:58 am

Re: Another question to the mechanic guys

Post by T. C. Downey »

lowNslow wrote:What size plastic tubing is generally used for replacing the tubing in the pitot/static system? Also what sized fittings are used at the instruments?
Your instruments should be 1/4" pipe threads all the fittings can be bought at Aircraft Spruce. the line size is 1/4"
T. C. Downey
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:58 am

Re: Another question to the mechanic guys

Post by T. C. Downey »

GA. who decides if the alteration is a major or minor?
User avatar
lowNslow
Posts: 1530
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 4:20 pm

Re: Another question to the mechanic guys

Post by lowNslow »

Thanks Tom. I assume you would use 3/8"OD tubing (1/4"ID) Is there a connector to use from the metal pitot tube to the new plastic tubing?
Last edited by lowNslow on Mon Jan 27, 2014 2:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
Karl
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
bagarre
Posts: 2615
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:35 pm

Re: Another question to the mechanic guys

Post by bagarre »

There is a fitting right where the aluminum pitot tube enters the wing. That's where you can put the first nylon fitting and replace the remaining with nylon.

You'll still need the aluminum tube that makes up the actual pitot tube that sticks into the wind as the nylon tube will not hold the required shape. The shape is detailed in the 100 series maintenance manual.

I swapped out all my static lines and fittings with nylon at the advice of the local avionics guy and we did it with a log book entry.
T. C. Downey
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:58 am

Re: Another question to the mechanic guys

Post by T. C. Downey »

lowNslow wrote:Thanks Tom. I assume you would use 3/8"OD tubing (1/4"ID) Is there a connector to use from the metal pitot tube to the new plastic tubing?
I'l stay with the 1/4" tubing, in the static or pitot systems you are not flowing any amount of air.
User avatar
cessna170bdriver
Posts: 4068
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:13 pm

Re: Another question to the mechanic guys

Post by cessna170bdriver »

T. C. Downey wrote:
lowNslow wrote:What size plastic tubing is generally used for replacing the tubing in the pitot/static system? Also what sized fittings are used at the instruments?
Your instruments should be 1/4" pipe threads all the fittings can be bought at Aircraft Spruce. the line size is 1/4"
Vaccum instruments might be 1/4" pipe with 3/8" hose, but aren't pitot/static instruments 1/8" pipe and 1/4" tube or hose?
Miles

“I envy no man that knows more than myself, but pity them that know less.”
— Thomas Browne
User avatar
n2582d
Posts: 2834
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 4:58 am

Re: Another question to the mechanic guys

Post by n2582d »

If you're flying IFR in your 170 you might be interested in adding an alternate static source to your system while you're switching to nylon tubing. I've added AK210-48L to the maintenance library for reference.
Last edited by n2582d on Mon Jan 27, 2014 8:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Gary
User avatar
lowNslow
Posts: 1530
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 4:20 pm

Re: Another question to the mechanic guys

Post by lowNslow »

cessna170bdriver wrote: Your instruments should be 1/4" pipe threads all the fittings can be bought at Aircraft Spruce. the line size is 1/4"

Vaccum instruments might be 1/4" pipe with 3/8" hose, but aren't pitot/static instruments 1/8" pipe and 1/4" tube or hose?
That's what I'm trying to determine, but I guess I'll find out when I start digging in.
Karl
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
User avatar
lowNslow
Posts: 1530
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 4:20 pm

Re: Another question to the mechanic guys

Post by lowNslow »

n2582d wrote:If you're flying IFR in your 170 you might be interested in adding an alternate static source to your system while you're switching to nylon tubing. I've added SK210-48L to the maintenance library for reference.
Thanks Gary, good idea.
Karl
'53 170B N3158B SN:25400
ASW-20BL
T. C. Downey
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:58 am

Re: Another question to the mechanic guys

Post by T. C. Downey »

lowNslow wrote:
cessna170bdriver wrote: Your instruments should be 1/4" pipe threads all the fittings can be bought at Aircraft Spruce. the line size is 1/4"
Vaccum instruments might be 1/4" pipe with 3/8" hose, but aren't pitot/static instruments 1/8" pipe and 1/4" tube or hose?
That's what I'm trying to determine, but I guess I'll find out when I start digging in.
Yes, My Bad, the instrument openings are 1/8" pipe not 1/4" as I said before.
User avatar
interstellardust
Posts: 70
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 11:36 pm

Re: Another question to the mechanic guys

Post by interstellardust »

I need to replace the rubber hose that connects my venturi as it comes through the right side wall under the instrument panel to the pressure releif valve. I cant see the fitting on the sidewall yet, but the one on the pressure releif valve looks like an 90 degree elbow AN fitting. I've read through the rest of this thread and noted the 1/8" 1/4" inch discussion but the outside diameter of this particular hose is 5/8"

I suppose I could cut the old hose off and measure but I was hoping to have the new hose on hand before I do that. I'm still pulling 4.5" of vacumm. I can just tell this hose isn't long for this world.

I don't think I still have the "original" gyro installed. The one in the panel is a newer model, probably only 40 years old. However, I think the venturi (single) is original. Part of the run between the relief valve and the gyro looks like 1/4" tubing connected at each end with the same rubber hose. It looks like replacement hose would be 306 but what size?
smaller photo
smaller photo
I'm not sure if this picture will show up.
Bill Garnett
1955 Cessna 170B N2974D
bill@interstellardust.com
Post Reply