Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher
That is one reason why I'm not in the northeast anymore. When my rent went from $450 to $490 per month 2 years ago I moved outside for $80 a month. The trip to the airport was 45 minutes each way. Now I have a hangar drive just under 10 minutes and pay $240 per quarter. Smaller hanger but it works for me.N9149A wrote:In the northeast where I live hangers go for $450 a month and up and in many cases there is a waiting list that can take years till a hanger is available at any cost.
Tailing aircraft to each other (one tail alongside the others fuselage) will park two planes in a space only a little larger than that required for one. (In other words, nest them such as many T-hangars do it...without the walls being between aircraft.)Brad Brady wrote:[..., you could put a taildragger tail under a nose wheel aircraft and make several feet more than a tail dragger to taildragger so we had a myriad of aircraft positioned in several different ways to make them fit...
Huh. I've proven that hangar rash happens in single-occupancy hangars, predating my current multi-occupancy, which is rash-free (so far). Heck, I've proven it can even happen outside a hangar, if you turn the airplane too close to it!blueldr wrote:Murphys Law concerning hangar rash was developed by using multiple occupancy hangars.
