Lower Forward fuselage cracking
Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher
Lower Forward fuselage cracking
I have read posts about some cracking of the forward lower fuselage near the lower engine mounts. I had a crack and it is starting to expand. Has anyone replaced the skin or just put on a doubler?
Thoughts or prayers.
Thanks
Brad
Thoughts or prayers.
Thanks
Brad
Re: Lower Forward fuselage cracking
Can you post a picture?
Re: Lower Forward fuselage cracking
I'd stop drill the crack and watch it. I've had two cracks at those areas. The first one I didn't get to in time and made a doubler picking up the original holes on the stringer of the lower mount and the firewall angles. The second crack on the other side I caught in time, stop drilled and it's been good ( no further crack progression).
Jim McIntosh..
1953 C170B S/N 25656
02 K1200RS
1953 C170B S/N 25656
02 K1200RS
Re: Lower Forward fuselage cracking
One area to check are the rubber isolators at the engine mount to firewall. These are 2 piece and can be hard over time and not working. Paragraph in the early 100 series service manual on installation torque of these.
Mike Roe
Mike Roe
-
- Posts: 3485
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 6:05 pm
Re: Lower Forward fuselage cracking
If you have an air box cowling, what I think is going on is when you are in flight, the air loads push down on the top of the cowl. You will most likely see wear on the top front of the air box where the two top cowl hinge support angles are bearing down on the front of the air box. This down force also translates into the lower cowl, then into the lower corner of the cowl where the down force is finally reacted by the fuselage skin at the lower corners of the lower cowl. Over time, the two lower corners crack out. My 1951 A Model had similar cracks that were repaired and patched when the plane was restored.
Before the failure process was understood, the upper cowl hinge support angles were cut out where they contacted the air box thinking that would correct the problem. However, it made the problem worse because the top cowl could then deflect further downward putting more stress on the lower cowl corners causing them to crack out.
What I did was to make some teflon bumpers that attach to the top front of the air box center section support with Monadnock fasteners that fit just inside the top cowl hinge support angles. The top cowl angles rest on the teflon blocks which keeps them from deflecting down during flight. That allows the down-force from the top cowl to be reacted into the engine then engine mount instead of the fuselage skins. The pictures show where the Monadnock fasteners and teflon blocks are installed. In 300 hours since restoration, no more cracks have formed.
Also, checking the rubber isolators at the engine mount to fuselage attach points is a good idea but many rubber isolators have been changed to aluminum bushings which eliminate the rubber isolators. If the rubber isolators have collapsed and the bolts are bearing into the firewall, that could allow the engine to sag and which in turn would allow the down force on the top of the cowl to force the top cowl down farther which will apply more stress to the lower cowl lower corners causing the cracks to continue.
Before the failure process was understood, the upper cowl hinge support angles were cut out where they contacted the air box thinking that would correct the problem. However, it made the problem worse because the top cowl could then deflect further downward putting more stress on the lower cowl corners causing them to crack out.
What I did was to make some teflon bumpers that attach to the top front of the air box center section support with Monadnock fasteners that fit just inside the top cowl hinge support angles. The top cowl angles rest on the teflon blocks which keeps them from deflecting down during flight. That allows the down-force from the top cowl to be reacted into the engine then engine mount instead of the fuselage skins. The pictures show where the Monadnock fasteners and teflon blocks are installed. In 300 hours since restoration, no more cracks have formed.
Also, checking the rubber isolators at the engine mount to fuselage attach points is a good idea but many rubber isolators have been changed to aluminum bushings which eliminate the rubber isolators. If the rubber isolators have collapsed and the bolts are bearing into the firewall, that could allow the engine to sag and which in turn would allow the down force on the top of the cowl to force the top cowl down farther which will apply more stress to the lower cowl lower corners causing the cracks to continue.
Last edited by hilltop170 on Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:22 am, edited 4 times in total.
Richard Pulley
2014-2016 TIC170A Past President
1951 170A, N1715D, s/n 20158, O-300D
2023 Best Original 170A at Sault Ste. Marie
Owned from 1973 to 1984.
Bought again in 2006 after 22 years.
It's not for sale!
2014-2016 TIC170A Past President
1951 170A, N1715D, s/n 20158, O-300D
2023 Best Original 170A at Sault Ste. Marie
Owned from 1973 to 1984.
Bought again in 2006 after 22 years.
It's not for sale!
Re: Lower Forward fuselage cracking
Thanks. I will post a picture next week. Unfortunately I flew home a couple hours and the crack that I stop drilled worked back towards the front and a piece the size of a nickel is now gone.
Thanks for the info. I will take this and determine how to attack it. Unfortunately I don't have much patch experience.
Brad
Thanks for the info. I will take this and determine how to attack it. Unfortunately I don't have much patch experience.
Brad
Last edited by piclr60 on Wed Oct 15, 2014 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Lower Forward fuselage cracking
Brad,piclr60 wrote:...........................I don't have much patch experience so I will be looking for somebody trustworthy in the Chicago area to help fix.
Brad
You might try another Brad. Brad Brady is a member here and is located in Dwight, look him up in the directory.
John E. Barrett
aka. Johneb
Sent from my "Cray Super Computer"
aka. Johneb
Sent from my "Cray Super Computer"
Re: Lower Forward fuselage cracking
There are many old posts referring to cracking in that area as well as cracking engine mount stringers. I'd do a search for those posts.
Re: Lower Forward fuselage cracking
I am confused are you talking about cracking on the lower cowling, or cracking on the lower fuselage near the engine mount?
Ed Booth, 170-B and RV-7 Driver
Re: Lower Forward fuselage cracking
Fuselage skin behind the lower engine mount. Apparently a known problem. I have two small cracks that propagated from the same location on the right side of my 170A(approx 1/2" each). Stop drill holes kept them from progressing for a few years. I am concerned about corrosion in that area because it is in the exhaust path. Have others installed a doubler on the fuselage skin leaving room for the cowl attach screw? Will be interested to hear more info on this. I searched as Minton suggested but didn't come up with much on this site. I am probably not using the right word(s).
Re: Lower Forward fuselage cracking
With a doubler, the cowl will be spread further away from the skin which as you have correctly surmised poses further problems. Stop drilling is a short term solution (although I've been looking at the same hole for awhile now), skin replacement will solve the problem.
In my case, I had a fair amount of surface corrosion that I had removed from the ica in side of the fuselage skins. The corrosion I believe was due to stringer that houses the engine mount had provided a horizontal surface (to the skin) which allowed debris and contaminates from the cabin to accumulate on.
In my case, I had a fair amount of surface corrosion that I had removed from the ica in side of the fuselage skins. The corrosion I believe was due to stringer that houses the engine mount had provided a horizontal surface (to the skin) which allowed debris and contaminates from the cabin to accumulate on.
Jim McIntosh..
1953 C170B S/N 25656
02 K1200RS
1953 C170B S/N 25656
02 K1200RS
Re: Lower Forward fuselage cracking
Thank You for the good advice. If I change the skin, how does that solve the problem? Won't the same thing happen again?
Brad
Brad
Re: Lower Forward fuselage cracking
My thoughts are the cracks either start, or are not helped by old, hardened, and collapsed rubber isolators in the firewall. These are out of sight out of mind. See if you can look in the log books to see when, if ever they were replaced. Cessna did away with these on the redesigned early 172 firewall. If I had to do it over I would eliminate the isolators and install the seaplane metal bushings in their place. This is only my thoughts and I am sure some will agree or disagree. Replacing the skin, if its the one I think it is, is not a easy task. It is also the glare shield, which means the windshield will have to come out. And also the engine removed. Which come to think of it, will be a good time to replace the isolators. I would go with a internal doubler and hang the engine and move it forward enough to replace the isolators. You might get by with using a Martin head countersunk solid rivet to attach the doubler for a cleaner look on the outside. These have a shallower head than the AN426 countersunk.
Mike Roe
Mike Roe
Re: Lower Forward fuselage cracking
Hi Mike,mike roe wrote:... You might get by with using a Martin head countersunk solid rivet to attach the doubler for a cleaner look on the outside. These have a shallower head than the AN426 countersunk.
Mike Roe
Where do you find Martin head countersunk rivets? Never heard of them. I used NAS1097 reduced head countersunk rivets to install nutplates on the glare shield for the windshield retainer. They are not to be used in structural applications though.
Gary
Re: Lower Forward fuselage cracking
Makes sense to reason why the cracking took place. In my case the individual nut plates were attached to the skin whereas I believe there should be a nut plate strip at the forward skin lip on both sides below the top mount down to the lower end of the skin. If anyone with a B wants to confirm that or dispute it please feel free. My cracks eminated from an individual nut plate hole.
If any loads other than skin loads are imposed on the skin likely it will crack. So if your cowls fit poorly like Richard suggests then it's likely you'll get cracks somewhere at the attach points. Fatigue in the skin is also a possibility if your vibration devices have deteriorated.
As for skin replacement, depends on which skin and which model in terms of difficulty.
If any loads other than skin loads are imposed on the skin likely it will crack. So if your cowls fit poorly like Richard suggests then it's likely you'll get cracks somewhere at the attach points. Fatigue in the skin is also a possibility if your vibration devices have deteriorated.
As for skin replacement, depends on which skin and which model in terms of difficulty.
Jim McIntosh..
1953 C170B S/N 25656
02 K1200RS
1953 C170B S/N 25656
02 K1200RS