14v or 12v

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

Post Reply
silkyd
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 7:31 pm

14v or 12v

Post by silkyd »

A Christmas gift was an aircraft quartz clock from Instrument Services Inc. in Roscoe Illinois that i want to put in my 52 170b. The instructions say use in a 12 volt system only.It is the clock they recommended for the 170. I noticed aircraft spruce also calls it a 12v clock. So are these airplanes 12v or 14v? And will this clock work? It claims to be a direct replacement for the Borg made electric clock in Cessna,Piper,Beechcraft and others.

jeff
Jeff
52 170B
User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10422
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

Jeff

They are 12v though you are correct that when the generator or alternator is turning and producing power it would be appropriate to the voltage to rise to over 14 volts. 24 volt aircraft actually make nearly 28 volts.

I'm sure you have the right clock voltage.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21295
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Post by GAHorn »

Yes, Bruce is absolutely correct, of course.
12 volt systems are also commonly called 14 volt systems because the battery in them is nominally a 12 v battery, yet the charging system is nominally 14 v (even tho' it may operate normally as high as 15 volts...the ideal is 13.8 volts. As corrosion builds over time, many connections no longer have perfect connections. Don't be distracted by such trivia. The charging device (alternator or generator usually) will ordinarily produce 1-3 volts more than the battery.

Another example is a 24 volt system...which is actually a 28 volt system, but will operate nominally correct anywhere between 24 and 29.5 volts before it is considered out-of-spec.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
silkyd
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 7:31 pm

thanks

Post by silkyd »

Having this site sure makes working on our 170's a lot more enjoyable! I am amazed when i read the posts and see how much useful (most of the time) knowledge you guys seem to carry around in your heads.
The membership in the 170 association is the best value out there.
Jeff
Jeff
52 170B
dacker
Posts: 412
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 2:05 am

Post by dacker »

Did manufacturers go to the 24 V system in order to use smaller (lighter) wiring (higher voltage, less amperage)? That is something that someone somewhere told me. It makes since, is that correct?
David
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21295
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Post by GAHorn »

That's the primary reason....i.e., less weight. (Also, more avionics selections are available.)
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
bsdunek
Posts: 425
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2004 6:42 pm

Post by bsdunek »

Other things get lighter too, such as motors, relays & solenoids. Anything with contacts can use smaller contacts, as the size is more dependent on amperage, which is lower with higher voltage at the same power requirement. 8)
Bruce
1950 170A N5559C
davevramp
Posts: 126
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:41 am

24 V system

Post by davevramp »

Did manufacturers go to the 24 V system in order to use smaller (lighter) wiring (higher voltage, less amperage)? That is something that someone somewhere told me. It makes since, is that correct?
David

They went to 24v batteries (28 volt system) for power requirements. As the equipment list grew the power requirements also grew. It got to the point that 60, 80 amps were not enough. Same deal with cars at 6 volts could not cut it so they went to 12v. I do not see why cars aren’t at 24 volt systems now, but i am sure it will be shortly. Also the 12 to 24 change reduces the heat and line loses considerably

dave
User avatar
cessna170bdriver
Posts: 4115
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:13 pm

Post by cessna170bdriver »

Many of the avionics offerings now have power supplies that accept anything from 11-33 volts.

Miles
User avatar
Paul-WI
Posts: 210
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 12:23 pm

Post by Paul-WI »

I do not see why cars aren’t at 24 volt systems now, but i am sure it will be shortly
Actually, some of the newer vehicles are 42 volt - more on your high end vehicles though. We have not seen any roll through our shop as of yet but it will be coming.

Paul
N3458D
User avatar
blueldr
Posts: 4442
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 3:16 am

Post by blueldr »

Another factor to keep in mind when consideribg aircraft storage batteries and their nominal voltage is cost. As the voltage goes up, so goes the price.

I sure hope that garden tractors maintain their current 12v. systems!
BL
User avatar
thammer
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 5:07 am

Post by thammer »

Paul-WI wrote:
I do not see why cars aren’t at 24 volt systems now, but i am sure it will be shortly
Actually, some of the newer vehicles are 42 volt - more on your high end vehicles though. We have not seen any roll through our shop as of yet but it will be coming.

Paul
N3458D
Our engineers have been working on 48 volt automotive equipment. They say the reason for going to the higher voltage is that they've reached limits in the power they can get out of the alternators and keep them reasonable. The way out of that issue and provide enough juice for the newer cars is a higher voltage electrical system. At least that's their story, sounded good to me.

tye
Post Reply
Cessna® is a registered trademark of Textron Aviation, Inc. The International Cessna® 170 Association is an independent owners/operators association dedicated to C170 aircraft and early O-300-powered C172s. We are not affiliated with Cessna® or Textron Aviation, Inc. in any way.