New tachometer questions

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

User avatar
KG
Posts: 493
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:14 pm

New tachometer questions

Post by KG »

During my engine overhaul project, I'm planning on replacing my tachometer with a new one. My mechanic has suggested that a new Mitchell tach is not much more expensive than overhauling my old tach.

I see on a couple of on line sources that the Mitchell D1-112-5023 is the replacement for the Cessna 170. It is listed as having an average cruise rpm of 2300. Is this the correct tach? I normally cruise at a higher rpm than 2300. Does it matter? They list other tachs with different average cruise rpms.

Also, for an additional charge, they can put custom markings on the tach face. Did I read somewhere that this is a requirement? What markings would you experts recommend that I have put on the tach? Red line, obviously. Anything else?

My mechanic also told me that he has had poor results lately from replacement tach drive cables. He said out of the last five or six he installed, only one worked correctly. He said some have come kinked and bent and others, for reasons unknown, cause the tach to twitch. That's what my old one does so I don't want to replace it with a new twitching tach. Anybody else run into problems with new tach cables? Any suggestions to insure I get a good tach cable along with my new tach?

Thanks,
Keith
53 170B
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21295
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: New tachometer questions

Post by GAHorn »

That is the correct tach, and if the cable comes kinked or bent...reject it back on the seller.

The tach markings (for the C-145) are described in AFM:
Red Line = 2700 (All Models)
Green Arc - 2200-2450 (A and B models)
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
cessna170bdriver
Posts: 4115
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:13 pm

Re: New tachometer questions

Post by cessna170bdriver »

KG wrote:During my engine overhaul project, I'm planning on replacing my tachometer with a new one. My mechanic has suggested that a new Mitchell tach is not much more expensive than overhauling my old tach...
Thanks,
Keith
Keith, I had the same debate with myself during my overhaul 5 years ago. I ended up going with a new tach and I'm glad I did. The "twitchiness" in my needle must have been due to the internal condition of the (50+ years old) tach itself, as the new one is rock steady, even with the 15+ year-old (~1000 hours) tach cable. With the old tach, the "twitch" range was about 100 RPM, making the tach next to useless for purposes, say, of leaning for maximum power. Now, the slightest change in RPM is evident.

KG wrote:...It is listed as having an average cruise rpm of 2300. Is this the correct tach? I normally cruise at a higher rpm than 2300. Does it matter?...
I wondered about the 2300 RPM tach myslef, given that nominal cruise is about 2450. I log clock time from master switch on to master switch off, and as it turns out, tach hours with the 2300 RPM version run pretty close to clock time for a given flight.

KG wrote:...Also, for an additional charge, they can put custom markings on the tach face. Did I read somewhere that this is a requirement? What markings would you experts recommend that I have put on the tach? Red line, obviously. Anything else?
When I get home, I'll find and post a photo of how I had mine done. If I remember correctly, George blessed it, so it MUST be right! :lol:
Miles

“I envy no man that knows more than myself, but pity them that know less.”
— Thomas Browne
bagarre
Posts: 2615
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:35 pm

Re: New tachometer questions

Post by bagarre »

++ interest in those markings.
I'm replacing my tach this year too. Current one has no markings and has the +- 100RPM bounce.
What's the right cable/length for a '52 170B with an 0300D?

-David
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21295
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: New tachometer questions

Post by GAHorn »

bagarre wrote: ....What's the right cable/length for a '52 170B with an 0300D?

-David
It depends.

Where is your tach mounted versus the rest of the fleet? (see the problem?)

Suggest you remove yours and if you like its length...measure it.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
bagarre
Posts: 2615
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:35 pm

Re: New tachometer questions

Post by bagarre »

Good point. Mine is in the far right side of the panel.
I was hoping to pre-order everything without taking the plane apart to keep down time to a minimum.
User avatar
cessna170bdriver
Posts: 4115
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:13 pm

Re: New tachometer questions

Post by cessna170bdriver »

Here's a photo of my tach with custom markings as received from Aircraft Spruce. According to my records, it is a Mitchell D1-112-5024. I seem to remember it took a week or two to be delivered, and was $203 in 2006. I also seem to remember they would preset the hours to any value you requested. I chose to leave it at zero so I could keep track of TSMOH without doing any math. :)
TachAndCalibration.jpg
cessna170bdriver wrote:I wondered about the 2300 RPM tach myslef, given that nominal cruise is about 2450. I log clock time from master switch on to master switch off, and as it turns out, tach hours with the 2300 RPM version run pretty close to clock time for a given flight.
:oops: Checking the part number I ordered, it is geared for hours at 2400 RPM.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Miles

“I envy no man that knows more than myself, but pity them that know less.”
— Thomas Browne
User avatar
rhymes
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:35 pm

Re: New tachometer questions

Post by rhymes »

I too replaced our tachometer with the Mitchell, and had them put the RPM ranges on, as well as reset the hour meter to TTAF.
It took three tachs and cables, sent back and forth, before the tach would stop bouncing and give an accurate reading... but the Mitchell folks were very helpful, and just as perplexed as I was. After a couple hundred hours, it's doing great now. Reasonable price too, as I recall.
I'd buy from them again, and hope the gremlins stay away.
Bruce & Kathy Rhymes
1954 Cessna 170B
N2865C
User avatar
KG
Posts: 493
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:14 pm

Re: New tachometer questions

Post by KG »

rhymes wrote: It took three tachs and cables, sent back and forth, before the tach would stop bouncing and give an accurate reading...
That is what my mechanic is saying too. Coincidence? I'm wondering if there is a production / quality control issue somewhere. My mechanic thinks it is the cables giving the problem. I'll report back if I run into the same thing.
53 170B
User avatar
KG
Posts: 493
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:14 pm

Re: New tachometer questions

Post by KG »

cessna170bdriver wrote:Here's a photo of my tach with custom markings as received from Aircraft Spruce. According to my records, it is a Mitchell D1-112-5024. I seem to remember it took a week or two to be delivered, and was $203 in 2006. I also seem to remember they would preset the hours to any value you requested. I chose to leave it at zero so I could keep track of TSMOH without doing any math. :)
TachAndCalibration.jpg
Thanks everybody. I'll be ordering one marked like that today.
53 170B
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21295
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: New tachometer questions

Post by GAHorn »

Look at my tachometer. It's was installed (reading zero hours) at completion of my airplane's restoration 13 years ago, it's horometer reading is same as engine time.

In this picture, (taken for the right-seater-course expertly delivered by Bob Lavery at the 2007 GLS convention), the engine is RUNNING at cruise RPM, and has over 721 hours and the tach has over 13 years on it.
MVC-002S.JPG
LOOK how steady that needle is! NO TWITCHINESS!

Get the Mitchell. Don't bend or kink the cable.

Image
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
KG
Posts: 493
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:14 pm

Re: New tachometer questions

Post by KG »

That is one steady tachometer!

Here's an update.... I just talked to Spruce and ordered a tach. They said they had them on back order from Feb of 2010 until Nov, when they got in a shipment of, I think she said, 60. Those are all gone and they are again on back order.

As I waited, she called Mitchell and asked about shipping dates and she told me that if I ordered with custom markings, which I planned to do anyway, it would be shipped direct from Mitchell and I would get it quicker. They said to expect about two weeks. We'll see.

I'll keep you posted.
K
53 170B
User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10422
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Re: New tachometer questions

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

I don't know. If you click to enlarge the picture I think you'll detect a twitch.
MVC-002S.gif
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
HA
Posts: 353
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 11:41 pm

Re: New tachometer questions

Post by HA »

that ghostly image of a guy with a camera would distract me, can that be polished out?
'56 "C170 and change"
'52 Packard 200
'68 Arctic Cat P12 Panther
"He's a menace to everything in the air. Yes, birds too." - Airplane
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21295
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: New tachometer questions

Post by GAHorn »

Bruce Fenstermacher wrote:I don't know. If you click to enlarge the picture I think you'll detect a twitch.
MVC-002S.gif

A-HA!

So it's BRUCE that causes all these problems!!!
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
Post Reply
Cessna® is a registered trademark of Textron Aviation, Inc. The International Cessna® 170 Association is an independent owners/operators association dedicated to C170 aircraft and early O-300-powered C172s. We are not affiliated with Cessna® or Textron Aviation, Inc. in any way.